File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: The unique role of picture rapid naming in predicting Chinese literacy skills

TitleThe unique role of picture rapid naming in predicting Chinese literacy skills
Authors
KeywordsLiteracy Skills
Reading speed
Rapid naming
Chinese
Issue Date2016
PublisherSociety for the Scientific Study of Reading.
Citation
The 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading (SSSR 2016), Porto, Portugal, 13-16 July 2016 How to Cite?
AbstractRapid automatized naming (RAN) has been established as a powerful predictor of word reading skills, but its strength of prediction may vary depending on the type of stimuli one is asked to name. Research in alphabetic writing systems has showed that there is a highly specific relationship between rapid naming of alphanumeric stimuli and children’s reading abilities, while the naming of non-alphanumeric stimuli (e.g., pictures) was only a modest predictor. Despite the less recognized role of picture RAN in learning to read in alphabetic writing systems, it is acknowledged that picture RAN taps into distinctive cognitive processes that do not involve in letters and digits RAN (e.g., efficient access to semantic information). More importantly, these processes may resemble critical processes underlying literacy acquisition in non-alphabetic writing systems, such as Chinese. To fill this research gap, the present study examined the unique contribution of both letter RAN and picture RAN to various literacy skills (word reading accuracy, word reading fluency, and word spelling) in 58 Chinese children in elementary grades. Results of hierarchical regressions suggested that the relative importance of letter and picture RAN tends to vary for different literacy domains. In the prediction of Chinese word reading accuracy and spelling, letter RAN was found to explain 20%-51% variance in the two dependent variables, while picture RAN did not make unique prediction beyond that. However, both letter and picture RAN were found to have significant and unique contribution to reading fluency. Interestingly, it was found that beyond the 41% variance accounted by reading accuracy in explaining reading speed, picture RAN (but not letter RAN) further explained 9% unique variance in reading speed. We shall discuss the distinct cognitive demands of letter and picture RAN tasks and how they may represent the underlying cognitive processes of the three Chinese literacy skills respectively.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248034

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFong, CCC-
dc.contributor.authorHo, CSH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, DWO-
dc.contributor.authorChung, KKH-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:36:40Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:36:40Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading (SSSR 2016), Porto, Portugal, 13-16 July 2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248034-
dc.description.abstractRapid automatized naming (RAN) has been established as a powerful predictor of word reading skills, but its strength of prediction may vary depending on the type of stimuli one is asked to name. Research in alphabetic writing systems has showed that there is a highly specific relationship between rapid naming of alphanumeric stimuli and children’s reading abilities, while the naming of non-alphanumeric stimuli (e.g., pictures) was only a modest predictor. Despite the less recognized role of picture RAN in learning to read in alphabetic writing systems, it is acknowledged that picture RAN taps into distinctive cognitive processes that do not involve in letters and digits RAN (e.g., efficient access to semantic information). More importantly, these processes may resemble critical processes underlying literacy acquisition in non-alphabetic writing systems, such as Chinese. To fill this research gap, the present study examined the unique contribution of both letter RAN and picture RAN to various literacy skills (word reading accuracy, word reading fluency, and word spelling) in 58 Chinese children in elementary grades. Results of hierarchical regressions suggested that the relative importance of letter and picture RAN tends to vary for different literacy domains. In the prediction of Chinese word reading accuracy and spelling, letter RAN was found to explain 20%-51% variance in the two dependent variables, while picture RAN did not make unique prediction beyond that. However, both letter and picture RAN were found to have significant and unique contribution to reading fluency. Interestingly, it was found that beyond the 41% variance accounted by reading accuracy in explaining reading speed, picture RAN (but not letter RAN) further explained 9% unique variance in reading speed. We shall discuss the distinct cognitive demands of letter and picture RAN tasks and how they may represent the underlying cognitive processes of the three Chinese literacy skills respectively.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSociety for the Scientific Study of Reading. -
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, SSSR 2016-
dc.subjectLiteracy Skills-
dc.subjectReading speed-
dc.subjectRapid naming-
dc.subjectChinese-
dc.titleThe unique role of picture rapid naming in predicting Chinese literacy skills-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailHo, CSH: shhoc@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHo, CSH=rp00631-
dc.identifier.hkuros279818-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats