File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods

TitleExploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods
Authors
KeywordsMethod evaluation
Trial-to-trial latency variability
Single-trial ERP latency estimation
Intra-subject variability
Issue Date2017
Citation
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2017, v. 75, p. 1-21 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017 Elsevier Ltd The intra-subject variability (ISV) in brain responses during cognitive processing across experimental trials has been recognised as an important facet of neural functionality reflecting an intrinsic neurophysiological characteristic of the brain. In recent decades, ISV in behaviour has been found to be significantly associated with cognitive functioning varying across individuals, development, ages, and pathological conditions. Event-related potentials (ERPs) measured in single trials are important tools for characterizing ISV at the neural level. However, due to the overlapping spectra of noise and signals, the retrieval of information from single-trial ERPs related to cognitive processing has been a challenge. We review the major problems that researchers face in the estimation of ISV in single-trial ERPs. Then, we present an extensive evaluation of several methods of single-trial latency estimation based on both simulated and real data. The relationships of ISV in ERPs and reaction times are compared between the different single-trial methods to assess their relative efficiency in predicting task performance from neural signals. The pros and cons of the methods are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246789
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 8.58
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.290

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, Guang-
dc.contributor.authorHildebrandt, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorSommer, Werner-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Changsong-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T04:27:59Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-26T04:27:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2017, v. 75, p. 1-21-
dc.identifier.issn0149-7634-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246789-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Elsevier Ltd The intra-subject variability (ISV) in brain responses during cognitive processing across experimental trials has been recognised as an important facet of neural functionality reflecting an intrinsic neurophysiological characteristic of the brain. In recent decades, ISV in behaviour has been found to be significantly associated with cognitive functioning varying across individuals, development, ages, and pathological conditions. Event-related potentials (ERPs) measured in single trials are important tools for characterizing ISV at the neural level. However, due to the overlapping spectra of noise and signals, the retrieval of information from single-trial ERPs related to cognitive processing has been a challenge. We review the major problems that researchers face in the estimation of ISV in single-trial ERPs. Then, we present an extensive evaluation of several methods of single-trial latency estimation based on both simulated and real data. The relationships of ISV in ERPs and reaction times are compared between the different single-trial methods to assess their relative efficiency in predicting task performance from neural signals. The pros and cons of the methods are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews-
dc.subjectMethod evaluation-
dc.subjectTrial-to-trial latency variability-
dc.subjectSingle-trial ERP latency estimation-
dc.subjectIntra-subject variability-
dc.titleExploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.023-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85012293814-
dc.identifier.volume75-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage21-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7528-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats