File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s10896-009-9281-0
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77951206224
- WOS: WOS:000273255800009
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Examining an extension of Johnson's hypothesis: Is Male perpetrated intimate partner violence more underreported than Female violence?
Title | Examining an extension of Johnson's hypothesis: Is Male perpetrated intimate partner violence more underreported than Female violence? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Missing data Domestic violence Intimate partner violence Multiple imputation |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | Journal of Family Violence, 2010, v. 25, n. 2, p. 173-181 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper examines two hypotheses about under-reporting in intimate partner violence data. The first hypothesis holds that significant amounts of under-reporting of intimate partner violence occur due to stigma. The second examines the empirical evidence behind Johnson's (Journal of Marriage and the Family 57:238-294, 1995) contention that controversial findings of equal rates of intimate partner violence perpetration among men and women occur through a combination of heterogeneity in type of intimate partner violence and missing data. E. M. and Data Augmentation are used to correct for item non-response in the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. Strong support is found for general under-reporting; weak support is found for greater under-reporting of male violence. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244105 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 2.897 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.682 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Emery, Clifton R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-31T08:56:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-31T08:56:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Family Violence, 2010, v. 25, n. 2, p. 173-181 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0885-7482 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244105 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines two hypotheses about under-reporting in intimate partner violence data. The first hypothesis holds that significant amounts of under-reporting of intimate partner violence occur due to stigma. The second examines the empirical evidence behind Johnson's (Journal of Marriage and the Family 57:238-294, 1995) contention that controversial findings of equal rates of intimate partner violence perpetration among men and women occur through a combination of heterogeneity in type of intimate partner violence and missing data. E. M. and Data Augmentation are used to correct for item non-response in the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. Strong support is found for general under-reporting; weak support is found for greater under-reporting of male violence. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Family Violence | - |
dc.subject | Missing data | - |
dc.subject | Domestic violence | - |
dc.subject | Intimate partner violence | - |
dc.subject | Multiple imputation | - |
dc.title | Examining an extension of Johnson's hypothesis: Is Male perpetrated intimate partner violence more underreported than Female violence? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10896-009-9281-0 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77951206224 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 173 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 181 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000273255800009 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0885-7482 | - |