File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Towards a Transparent, Credible, Evidence-Based Decision-Making Process of New Drug Listing on the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary: Challenges and Suggestions

TitleTowards a Transparent, Credible, Evidence-Based Decision-Making Process of New Drug Listing on the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary: Challenges and Suggestions
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherAdis International Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/
Citation
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2018, v. 16 n. 1, p. 5-14 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this article is to describe the process, evaluation criteria, and possible outcomes of decision-making for new drugs listed in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary in comparison to the health technology assessment (HTA) policy overseas. Details of decision-making processes including the new drug listing submission, Drug Advisory Committee (DAC) meeting, and procedures prior to and following the meeting, were extracted from the official Hong Kong Hospital Authority drug formulary management website and manual. Publicly-available information related to the new drug decision-making process for five HTA agencies [the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the Australia Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), and the New Zealand Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC)] were reviewed and retrieved from official documents from public domains. The DAC is in charge of systemically and critically appraising new drugs before they are listed on the formulary, reviewing submitted applications, and making the decision to list the drug based on scientific evidence to which safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness are the primary considerations. When compared with other HTA agencies, transparency of the decision-making process of the DAC, the relevance of clinical and health economic evidence, and the lack of health economic and methodological input of submissions are the major challenges to the new-drug listing policy in Hong Kong. Despite these challenges, this review provides suggestions for the establishment of a more transparent, credible, and evidence-based decision-making process in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary. Proposals for improvement in the listing of new drugs in the formulary should be a priority of healthcare reforms.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242217
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.686
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.099
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, CKH-
dc.contributor.authorWu, O-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, BMY-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-24T01:36:51Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-24T01:36:51Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2018, v. 16 n. 1, p. 5-14-
dc.identifier.issn1175-5652-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/242217-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to describe the process, evaluation criteria, and possible outcomes of decision-making for new drugs listed in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary in comparison to the health technology assessment (HTA) policy overseas. Details of decision-making processes including the new drug listing submission, Drug Advisory Committee (DAC) meeting, and procedures prior to and following the meeting, were extracted from the official Hong Kong Hospital Authority drug formulary management website and manual. Publicly-available information related to the new drug decision-making process for five HTA agencies [the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the Australia Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), and the New Zealand Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC)] were reviewed and retrieved from official documents from public domains. The DAC is in charge of systemically and critically appraising new drugs before they are listed on the formulary, reviewing submitted applications, and making the decision to list the drug based on scientific evidence to which safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness are the primary considerations. When compared with other HTA agencies, transparency of the decision-making process of the DAC, the relevance of clinical and health economic evidence, and the lack of health economic and methodological input of submissions are the major challenges to the new-drug listing policy in Hong Kong. Despite these challenges, this review provides suggestions for the establishment of a more transparent, credible, and evidence-based decision-making process in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary. Proposals for improvement in the listing of new drugs in the formulary should be a priority of healthcare reforms.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAdis International Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://healtheconomics.adisonline.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Health Economics and Health Policy-
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-017-0339-5-
dc.titleTowards a Transparent, Credible, Evidence-Based Decision-Making Process of New Drug Listing on the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary: Challenges and Suggestions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, CKH: carlosho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, BMY: mycheung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, CKH=rp01931-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, BMY=rp01321-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40258-017-0339-5-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85023173218-
dc.identifier.hkuros273623-
dc.identifier.volume16-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage5-
dc.identifier.epage14-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000424013800002-
dc.publisher.placeNew Zealand-
dc.identifier.issnl1175-5652-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats