File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The effectiveness of structural interventions at suicide hotspots: A meta-analysis

TitleThe effectiveness of structural interventions at suicide hotspots: A meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsSuicide
Intervention studies
Meta-analysis
Issue Date2013
Citation
International Journal of Epidemiology, 2013, v. 42, n. 2, p. 541-548 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Certain sites have gained notoriety as 'hotspots' for suicide by jumping. Structural interventions (e.g. barriers and safety nets) have been installed at some of these sites. Individual studies examining the effectiveness of these interventions have been underpowered. Method: We conducted a meta-analysis, pooling data from nine studies. Results: Following the interventions, there was an 86% reduction in jumping suicides per year at the sites in question (95% CI 79% to 91%). There was a 44% increase in jumping suicides per year at nearby sites (95% CI 15% to 81%), but the net gain was a 28% reduction in all jumping suicides per year in the study cities (95% CI 13% to 40%). Conclusions: Structural interventions at 'hotspots' avert suicide at these sites. Some increases in suicide are evident at neighbouring sites, but there is an overall gain in terms of a reduction in all suicides by jumping. © The Author 2013; all rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/240729
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 9.685
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.406
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPirkis, Jane-
dc.contributor.authorSpittal, Matthew J.-
dc.contributor.authorCox, Georgina-
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Jo-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Yee Tak Derek-
dc.contributor.authorStuddert, David-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-12T01:46:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-12T01:46:41Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2013, v. 42, n. 2, p. 541-548-
dc.identifier.issn0300-5771-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/240729-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Certain sites have gained notoriety as 'hotspots' for suicide by jumping. Structural interventions (e.g. barriers and safety nets) have been installed at some of these sites. Individual studies examining the effectiveness of these interventions have been underpowered. Method: We conducted a meta-analysis, pooling data from nine studies. Results: Following the interventions, there was an 86% reduction in jumping suicides per year at the sites in question (95% CI 79% to 91%). There was a 44% increase in jumping suicides per year at nearby sites (95% CI 15% to 81%), but the net gain was a 28% reduction in all jumping suicides per year in the study cities (95% CI 13% to 40%). Conclusions: Structural interventions at 'hotspots' avert suicide at these sites. Some increases in suicide are evident at neighbouring sites, but there is an overall gain in terms of a reduction in all suicides by jumping. © The Author 2013; all rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Epidemiology-
dc.subjectSuicide-
dc.subjectIntervention studies-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.titleThe effectiveness of structural interventions at suicide hotspots: A meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ije/dyt021-
dc.identifier.pmid23505253-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84877049434-
dc.identifier.hkuros225120-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage541-
dc.identifier.epage548-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-3685-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000317627800029-
dc.identifier.issnl0300-5771-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats