File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Induction chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity: A cumulative meta-analysis

TitleInduction chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity: A cumulative meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsOral cancers
Mouth neoplasm
Induction chemotherapy
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Meta-analysis
Systematic review
Issue Date2016
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/oraloncology
Citation
Oral Oncology, 2016, v. 61, p. 104-114 How to Cite?
AbstractInduction chemotherapy (ICT) is a controversial treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Despite numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a majority do not have enough statistical power alone to conclude ICT’s treatment value among oral squamous carcinoma patients (OSCC) since many addressed HNSCC as one entity instead of by specific subtypes. By performing a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis, we aim to determine the benefits of ICT in OSCC therapy. A literature search identified for RCTs comparing OSCC patients who received ICT against those without. Log-hazard ratio, and relative risk were used for comparison. Heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic package. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), followed by disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: 27 randomized trials were included for analysis (n = 2872 patients). The shortest median follow-up was 15 months whereas the longest was 11.5 years. ICT does not improve OS (HR = 0.947, 95% CI 0.85–1.05, p = 0.318), DFS (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.21, p = 0.462) and DM (RR = 0.626, CI 95% 0.361–1.086, p = 0.096) compared to locoregional treatment alone. However, there was a significant improvement to LRR (RR = 0.778, 95% CI 0.622–0.972, p = 0.027). There is no evidence ICT improves survival outcomes for OSCC patients. However, ICT reduces locoregional recurrence of OSCC, which may need further verification.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/238629
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.972
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.623
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, A-
dc.contributor.authorLi, KY-
dc.contributor.authorYang, WF-
dc.contributor.authorSu, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-20T01:24:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-20T01:24:00Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationOral Oncology, 2016, v. 61, p. 104-114-
dc.identifier.issn1368-8375-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/238629-
dc.description.abstractInduction chemotherapy (ICT) is a controversial treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Despite numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a majority do not have enough statistical power alone to conclude ICT’s treatment value among oral squamous carcinoma patients (OSCC) since many addressed HNSCC as one entity instead of by specific subtypes. By performing a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis, we aim to determine the benefits of ICT in OSCC therapy. A literature search identified for RCTs comparing OSCC patients who received ICT against those without. Log-hazard ratio, and relative risk were used for comparison. Heterogeneity was determined using the I2 statistic package. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), followed by disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: 27 randomized trials were included for analysis (n = 2872 patients). The shortest median follow-up was 15 months whereas the longest was 11.5 years. ICT does not improve OS (HR = 0.947, 95% CI 0.85–1.05, p = 0.318), DFS (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.21, p = 0.462) and DM (RR = 0.626, CI 95% 0.361–1.086, p = 0.096) compared to locoregional treatment alone. However, there was a significant improvement to LRR (RR = 0.778, 95% CI 0.622–0.972, p = 0.027). There is no evidence ICT improves survival outcomes for OSCC patients. However, ICT reduces locoregional recurrence of OSCC, which may need further verification.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/oraloncology-
dc.relation.ispartofOral Oncology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectOral cancers-
dc.subjectMouth neoplasm-
dc.subjectInduction chemotherapy-
dc.subjectAdjuvant chemotherapy-
dc.subjectMeta-analysis-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.titleInduction chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity: A cumulative meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSu, Y: richsu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authoritySu, Y=rp01916-
dc.description.naturepreprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.08.022-
dc.identifier.pmid27688112-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84990050335-
dc.identifier.hkuros271158-
dc.identifier.volume61-
dc.identifier.spage104-
dc.identifier.epage114-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000384695400016-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1368-8375-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats