File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Proximity of premolar roots to maxillary sinus: A radiographic survey using cone-beam computed tomography

TitleProximity of premolar roots to maxillary sinus: A radiographic survey using cone-beam computed tomography
Authors
Keywordsmaxillary premolar
maxillary sinus
Cone-beam computed tomography
Issue Date2014
Citation
Journal of Endodontics, 2014, v. 40, n. 10, p. 1541-1548 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 American Association of Endodontists.Introduction The proximity of the roots of the posterior maxillary teeth to the maxillary sinus is a constant challenge to the dental practitioner. Because the majority of studies have assessed the relationship regarding molars, the present study focused on premolars.Methods Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 192 patients were reconstructed in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes to quantify the distances between the root apices of the maxillary premolars and the adjacent maxillary sinus. Measurements were taken for each root, and data were correlated with age, sex, side, and presence of both or absence of 1 of the 2 premolars.Results A total of 296 teeth (177 first and 119 second premolars) were evaluated. The mean distances from buccal roots of the first premolars to the border of the maxillary sinus in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes ranged from 5.15 ± 2.99 to 8.28 ± 6.27 mm. From palatal roots, the mean distances ranged from 4.20 ± 3.69 to 7.17 ± 6.14 mm. The mean distances of second premolars were markedly shorter in buccal roots between 2.32 ± 2.19 and 3.28 ± 3.17 mm and in palatal roots between 2.68 ± 3.58 and 3.80 ± 3.71 mm, respectively. The frequency of a premolar root protrusion into the maxillary sinus was very low in first premolars (0%-7.2%) but higher in second premolars (2.5%-13.6%). Sex, age, side, and presence/absence of premolars failed to significantly influence the mean distances between premolar roots and the maxillary sinus.Conclusions Based on the calculated mean distances of the present study, only few premolars (and if so second premolars) would present a risk of violating the border of the maxillary sinus during conventional or surgical endodontic treatment or in case of tooth extraction.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236235
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.422
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.850
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVon Arx, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorFodich, Ivo-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael M.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:18Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endodontics, 2014, v. 40, n. 10, p. 1541-1548-
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236235-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 American Association of Endodontists.Introduction The proximity of the roots of the posterior maxillary teeth to the maxillary sinus is a constant challenge to the dental practitioner. Because the majority of studies have assessed the relationship regarding molars, the present study focused on premolars.Methods Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 192 patients were reconstructed in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes to quantify the distances between the root apices of the maxillary premolars and the adjacent maxillary sinus. Measurements were taken for each root, and data were correlated with age, sex, side, and presence of both or absence of 1 of the 2 premolars.Results A total of 296 teeth (177 first and 119 second premolars) were evaluated. The mean distances from buccal roots of the first premolars to the border of the maxillary sinus in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes ranged from 5.15 ± 2.99 to 8.28 ± 6.27 mm. From palatal roots, the mean distances ranged from 4.20 ± 3.69 to 7.17 ± 6.14 mm. The mean distances of second premolars were markedly shorter in buccal roots between 2.32 ± 2.19 and 3.28 ± 3.17 mm and in palatal roots between 2.68 ± 3.58 and 3.80 ± 3.71 mm, respectively. The frequency of a premolar root protrusion into the maxillary sinus was very low in first premolars (0%-7.2%) but higher in second premolars (2.5%-13.6%). Sex, age, side, and presence/absence of premolars failed to significantly influence the mean distances between premolar roots and the maxillary sinus.Conclusions Based on the calculated mean distances of the present study, only few premolars (and if so second premolars) would present a risk of violating the border of the maxillary sinus during conventional or surgical endodontic treatment or in case of tooth extraction.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endodontics-
dc.subjectmaxillary premolar-
dc.subjectmaxillary sinus-
dc.subjectCone-beam computed tomography-
dc.titleProximity of premolar roots to maxillary sinus: A radiographic survey using cone-beam computed tomography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.022-
dc.identifier.pmid25129024-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84914102984-
dc.identifier.volume40-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage1541-
dc.identifier.epage1548-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000342888400005-
dc.identifier.issnl0099-2399-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats