File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: A prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5-to 9-year follow-up

TitleLong-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: A prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5-to 9-year follow-up
Authors
KeywordsClinical trial
Radiology
Bone regeneration
Bone grafting
Alveolar ridge augmentation
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Periodontology, 2013, v. 84, n. 11, p. 1517-1527 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation is documented with short- and medium-term studies. The long-term stability of contour augmentation is uncertain. Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 41 patients with an implant-borne single crown were examined twice, in 2006 and 2010. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were assessed at both examinations. In addition, a cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) image was obtained during the second examination to assess the dimensions of the facial bone wall. Results: All 41 implants demonstrated ankylotic stability without signs of peri-implant infection at both examinations. The clinical parameters remained stable over time. Satisfactory esthetic outcomes were noted, as assessed by the pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) indices. Overall, the PES scores were slightly higher than the WES scores. None of the implants developed mucosal recession over time, as confirmed by values of the distance between implant shoulder and mucosal margin and cast measurements. The periapical radiographs yielded stable peri-implant bone levels, with a mean distance between implant shoulder and first visible bone-implant contact value of 2.18 mm. The CBCT analysis demonstrated a mean thickness of the facial bone wall ≈2.2 mm. In two implants (4.9%) no facial bone wall was detectable radiographically. Conclusions: This prospective cross-sectional study demonstrates stable peri-implant hard and soft tissues for all 41 implants examined and satisfactory esthetic outcomes overall. The follow-up of 5 to 9 years confirmed again that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement. In addition, contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration was able to establish and maintain a facial bone wall in 95% of patients. J Periodontol 2013;84:1517-1527.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236215
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 3.392
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.070
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuser, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorChappuis, Vivianne-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael M.-
dc.contributor.authorWittneben, Julia Gabriela-
dc.contributor.authorFrei, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorBelser, Urs C.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:15Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, 2013, v. 84, n. 11, p. 1517-1527-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236215-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation is documented with short- and medium-term studies. The long-term stability of contour augmentation is uncertain. Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 41 patients with an implant-borne single crown were examined twice, in 2006 and 2010. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were assessed at both examinations. In addition, a cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) image was obtained during the second examination to assess the dimensions of the facial bone wall. Results: All 41 implants demonstrated ankylotic stability without signs of peri-implant infection at both examinations. The clinical parameters remained stable over time. Satisfactory esthetic outcomes were noted, as assessed by the pink and white esthetic score (PES/WES) indices. Overall, the PES scores were slightly higher than the WES scores. None of the implants developed mucosal recession over time, as confirmed by values of the distance between implant shoulder and mucosal margin and cast measurements. The periapical radiographs yielded stable peri-implant bone levels, with a mean distance between implant shoulder and first visible bone-implant contact value of 2.18 mm. The CBCT analysis demonstrated a mean thickness of the facial bone wall ≈2.2 mm. In two implants (4.9%) no facial bone wall was detectable radiographically. Conclusions: This prospective cross-sectional study demonstrates stable peri-implant hard and soft tissues for all 41 implants examined and satisfactory esthetic outcomes overall. The follow-up of 5 to 9 years confirmed again that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement. In addition, contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration was able to establish and maintain a facial bone wall in 95% of patients. J Periodontol 2013;84:1517-1527.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology-
dc.subjectClinical trial-
dc.subjectRadiology-
dc.subjectBone regeneration-
dc.subjectBone grafting-
dc.subjectAlveolar ridge augmentation-
dc.titleLong-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: A prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5-to 9-year follow-up-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.120635-
dc.identifier.pmid23347346-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84887422792-
dc.identifier.volume84-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1517-
dc.identifier.epage1527-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000328686100003-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats