File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of two bioabsorbable barrier membranes on bone regeneration of standardized defects in calvarial bone: A comparative histomorphometric study in pigs

TitleEffect of two bioabsorbable barrier membranes on bone regeneration of standardized defects in calvarial bone: A comparative histomorphometric study in pigs
Authors
KeywordsMembranes
Collagen
Bone regeneration
Biomaterials
Cross-linking
Issue Date2009
Citation
Journal of Periodontology, 2009, v. 80, n. 8, p. 1289-1299 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The effect of two different bioabsorbable collagen membranes on bone regeneration was assessed in standardized, membraneprotected calvarial defects in pigs. Methods: Two standardized defect types (6 × 6 × 6 mm and 9 × 9 × 9 mm) were produced inthe calvaria of pigs: empty defects without a membrane (group 1; eight defects per size); defects filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral(DBBM) withouta membrane (group2;eight defects per size); defects filled with DBBM and covered by a collagen membrane (group 3; eight defects per size); and defects filled with DBBM and covered by a cross-linked collagen membrane (CCM) (group 4; eight defects per size). Sacrifice took place 16 weeks after surgery, and the following parameters were analyzed: descriptive histology; semiquantitativehistology (SQH), assessing bone regeneration in the whole defect area; and histomorphometric analysis of the percentage of bone and DBBM in the regenerated area at three different depth levels of the defect. Results: Using SQH, both membrane types resulted in significantly better bone regeneration compared to groups 1 and 2, irrespective of the defect size (P <0.005), with no difference between the two membranes. In the histomorphometric analysis, the layer immediately below the surface exhibited a significantly higher percentage of bone in groups 3 (27%) and 4 (36%) versus the two other groups for the 9 × 9 × 9-mm defects. No such differences were apparent for the 6 × 6 × 6-mm defects or the other two depth levels (bottom and middle layer) for either defect size. Conclusions: The two collagen membranes tested significantly enhanced bone regeneration, especially in the superficial level of the calvarial bone defects. The prototype CCM did not provide any further advantage in the present animal model.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236148
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 3.392
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.070
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael M.-
dc.contributor.authorHeynen, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorBosshardt, Dieter D.-
dc.contributor.authorBuser, Daniel-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:04Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, 2009, v. 80, n. 8, p. 1289-1299-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236148-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The effect of two different bioabsorbable collagen membranes on bone regeneration was assessed in standardized, membraneprotected calvarial defects in pigs. Methods: Two standardized defect types (6 × 6 × 6 mm and 9 × 9 × 9 mm) were produced inthe calvaria of pigs: empty defects without a membrane (group 1; eight defects per size); defects filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral(DBBM) withouta membrane (group2;eight defects per size); defects filled with DBBM and covered by a collagen membrane (group 3; eight defects per size); and defects filled with DBBM and covered by a cross-linked collagen membrane (CCM) (group 4; eight defects per size). Sacrifice took place 16 weeks after surgery, and the following parameters were analyzed: descriptive histology; semiquantitativehistology (SQH), assessing bone regeneration in the whole defect area; and histomorphometric analysis of the percentage of bone and DBBM in the regenerated area at three different depth levels of the defect. Results: Using SQH, both membrane types resulted in significantly better bone regeneration compared to groups 1 and 2, irrespective of the defect size (P <0.005), with no difference between the two membranes. In the histomorphometric analysis, the layer immediately below the surface exhibited a significantly higher percentage of bone in groups 3 (27%) and 4 (36%) versus the two other groups for the 9 × 9 × 9-mm defects. No such differences were apparent for the 6 × 6 × 6-mm defects or the other two depth levels (bottom and middle layer) for either defect size. Conclusions: The two collagen membranes tested significantly enhanced bone regeneration, especially in the superficial level of the calvarial bone defects. The prototype CCM did not provide any further advantage in the present animal model.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology-
dc.subjectMembranes-
dc.subjectCollagen-
dc.subjectBone regeneration-
dc.subjectBiomaterials-
dc.subjectCross-linking-
dc.titleEffect of two bioabsorbable barrier membranes on bone regeneration of standardized defects in calvarial bone: A comparative histomorphometric study in pigs-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2009.090075-
dc.identifier.pmid19656029-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-68749118262-
dc.identifier.volume80-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage1289-
dc.identifier.epage1299-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000269024700013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats