File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-Month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients

TitleEarly implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-Month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients
Authors
KeywordsBone regeneration
Bone graft
Case series
Clinical trial
Gingival recession
Issue Date2009
Citation
Journal of Periodontology, 2009, v. 80, n. 1, p. 152-162 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Early implant placement is one of the treatment options in postextraction sites in the anterior maxilla. Implant placement is performed after a soft tissue healing period of 4 to 8 weeks. Implant placement is combined with a simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure to rebuild esthetic facial hard and soft tissue contours. Methods: In this prospective case-series study, 20 consecutive patients treated with an implant-borne single crown were prospectively followed for 12 months. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were recorded to assess treatment outcomes. Results: At the 12-month examination, all 20 implants were successfully integrated, demonstrating ankylotic stability and healthy peri-implant soft tissues as documented by standard parameters. The esthetic outcomes assessed by a pink esthetic score (PES) and a white esthetic score (WES) demonstrated pleasing results overall. The WES values were slightly superior to the PES values. The periapical radiographs showed minimal crestal bone loss around the used bone level implants, with mean bone loss of 0.18 mm at 12 months. Only one implant showed >0.5 mm bone loss, combined with minor mucosal recession of 0.5 to 1.0 mm. Conclusions: This prospective case series study evaluating the concept of early implant placement demonstrated successful tissue integration for all 20 implants. The short-term follow-up of 12 months revealed pleasing esthetic outcomes overall, as assessed by objective parameters. The risk for mucosal recession was low; only one patient showed minor recession of the facial mucosa. These encouraging results need to be confirmed with 3- and 5-year follow-up examinations.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236137
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 3.392
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.070
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuser, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorHalbritter, Sandro-
dc.contributor.authorHart, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael M.-
dc.contributor.authorGrütter, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorChappuis, Vivianne-
dc.contributor.authorBelser, Urs C.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:02Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Periodontology, 2009, v. 80, n. 1, p. 152-162-
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236137-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Early implant placement is one of the treatment options in postextraction sites in the anterior maxilla. Implant placement is performed after a soft tissue healing period of 4 to 8 weeks. Implant placement is combined with a simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure to rebuild esthetic facial hard and soft tissue contours. Methods: In this prospective case-series study, 20 consecutive patients treated with an implant-borne single crown were prospectively followed for 12 months. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were recorded to assess treatment outcomes. Results: At the 12-month examination, all 20 implants were successfully integrated, demonstrating ankylotic stability and healthy peri-implant soft tissues as documented by standard parameters. The esthetic outcomes assessed by a pink esthetic score (PES) and a white esthetic score (WES) demonstrated pleasing results overall. The WES values were slightly superior to the PES values. The periapical radiographs showed minimal crestal bone loss around the used bone level implants, with mean bone loss of 0.18 mm at 12 months. Only one implant showed >0.5 mm bone loss, combined with minor mucosal recession of 0.5 to 1.0 mm. Conclusions: This prospective case series study evaluating the concept of early implant placement demonstrated successful tissue integration for all 20 implants. The short-term follow-up of 12 months revealed pleasing esthetic outcomes overall, as assessed by objective parameters. The risk for mucosal recession was low; only one patient showed minor recession of the facial mucosa. These encouraging results need to be confirmed with 3- and 5-year follow-up examinations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontology-
dc.subjectBone regeneration-
dc.subjectBone graft-
dc.subjectCase series-
dc.subjectClinical trial-
dc.subjectGingival recession-
dc.titleEarly implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-Month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2009.080360-
dc.identifier.pmid19228101-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-58349114071-
dc.identifier.volume80-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage152-
dc.identifier.epage162-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000262336500018-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats