File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals

TitleA scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals
Authors
KeywordsJournal influence
Journal quality
Technology-based communication
Journal rankings
Business communication
Professional communication
Scientometrics
Technical communication
Journal survey
Issue Date2007
Citation
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2007, v. 50, n. 4, p. 352-378 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this paper we present, from an academic perspective, the perceived quality ratings of business and technical communication journals. Through a survey of academic experts, we asked respondents to rate the top overall journals, business communication journals, technical communication journals, and the top journals from a technology perspective. In addition, we asked respondents to list the journals that they read most frequently. We analyzed the results by breaking down the rankings into world regions and academic departments. The top-three overall journals for all regions are Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Journal of Business Communication, and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. Importantly, differences by world region and academic department type were found in all these rankings. These results can support researchers worldwide by helping them target their publishing efforts to journals that have the best fit with their business and technical communication discipline, world region, and academic home. © 2007 IEEE.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/233781
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.243
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.632

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLowry, Paul Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorHumpherys, Sean LaMarc-
dc.contributor.authorMalwitz, Jason-
dc.contributor.authorNix, Joshua-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-27T07:21:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-27T07:21:38Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2007, v. 50, n. 4, p. 352-378-
dc.identifier.issn0361-1434-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/233781-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we present, from an academic perspective, the perceived quality ratings of business and technical communication journals. Through a survey of academic experts, we asked respondents to rate the top overall journals, business communication journals, technical communication journals, and the top journals from a technology perspective. In addition, we asked respondents to list the journals that they read most frequently. We analyzed the results by breaking down the rankings into world regions and academic departments. The top-three overall journals for all regions are Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Journal of Business Communication, and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. Importantly, differences by world region and academic department type were found in all these rankings. These results can support researchers worldwide by helping them target their publishing efforts to journals that have the best fit with their business and technical communication discipline, world region, and academic home. © 2007 IEEE.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication-
dc.subjectJournal influence-
dc.subjectJournal quality-
dc.subjectTechnology-based communication-
dc.subjectJournal rankings-
dc.subjectBusiness communication-
dc.subjectProfessional communication-
dc.subjectScientometrics-
dc.subjectTechnical communication-
dc.subjectJournal survey-
dc.titleA scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TPC.2007.908733-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-38149069571-
dc.identifier.volume50-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage352-
dc.identifier.epage378-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats