File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1109/TPC.2007.908733
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-38149069571
- WOS: WOS:000251339600008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals
Title | A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Journal influence Journal quality Technology-based communication Journal rankings Business communication Professional communication Scientometrics Technical communication Journal survey |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Citation | IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2007, v. 50, n. 4, p. 352-378 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In this paper we present, from an academic perspective, the perceived quality ratings of business and technical communication journals. Through a survey of academic experts, we asked respondents to rate the top overall journals, business communication journals, technical communication journals, and the top journals from a technology perspective. In addition, we asked respondents to list the journals that they read most frequently. We analyzed the results by breaking down the rankings into world regions and academic departments. The top-three overall journals for all regions are Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Journal of Business Communication, and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. Importantly, differences by world region and academic department type were found in all these rankings. These results can support researchers worldwide by helping them target their publishing efforts to journals that have the best fit with their business and technical communication discipline, world region, and academic home. © 2007 IEEE. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/233781 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 1.447 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.422 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lowry, Paul Benjamin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Humpherys, Sean LaMarc | - |
dc.contributor.author | Malwitz, Jason | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nix, Joshua | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-27T07:21:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-27T07:21:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 2007, v. 50, n. 4, p. 352-378 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0361-1434 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/233781 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper we present, from an academic perspective, the perceived quality ratings of business and technical communication journals. Through a survey of academic experts, we asked respondents to rate the top overall journals, business communication journals, technical communication journals, and the top journals from a technology perspective. In addition, we asked respondents to list the journals that they read most frequently. We analyzed the results by breaking down the rankings into world regions and academic departments. The top-three overall journals for all regions are Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Journal of Business Communication, and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. Importantly, differences by world region and academic department type were found in all these rankings. These results can support researchers worldwide by helping them target their publishing efforts to journals that have the best fit with their business and technical communication discipline, world region, and academic home. © 2007 IEEE. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication | - |
dc.subject | Journal influence | - |
dc.subject | Journal quality | - |
dc.subject | Technology-based communication | - |
dc.subject | Journal rankings | - |
dc.subject | Business communication | - |
dc.subject | Professional communication | - |
dc.subject | Scientometrics | - |
dc.subject | Technical communication | - |
dc.subject | Journal survey | - |
dc.title | A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/TPC.2007.908733 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-38149069571 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 50 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 352 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 378 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000251339600008 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0361-1434 | - |