File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Aesthetic outcomes of zirconia surface using different sterilization methods

TitleAesthetic outcomes of zirconia surface using different sterilization methods
Authors
Issue Date2016
Citation
The 94th General Session and Exhibition of the IADR, 3rd Meeting of the IADR Asia Pacific Region and 35th Annual Meeting of the IADR Korean Dicision, Seoul, Korea, 22-25 June 2016. How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the aesthetic outcomes of zirconia surface using different sterilization methods. METHODS: Forty eight zirconia disks (Y-TZP, Cercon, Dentsply) were cut (diameter 25mm, thickness 1mm), prepared and polished to the same surface roughness (Ra~0.2mm) by profilometer. The specimen were then exposed to steam autoclave sterilization (Group S), UV irradiation (Group UV) and gamma ray irradiation (Group γ). After the treatments, zirconia surface were characterized and compared with the control group (i.e. without any sterilization treatment, Group C) by colour using naked eye under 6500K light illumination, surface roughness, surface free energies (SFE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). RESULTS: The colour of the white zirconia sample did not have obvious changes in Group S compared to Group C. However, the colour of the zirconia changed to light yellow in Group UV and dark brown in Group γ. Surface roughness result showed the highest mean Ra value (0.61±0.04mm) in Group γ, which was significantly higher than all the other four groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the other three groups of group C (0.24±0.08mm), group S (0.22±0.08mm), and group UV (0.18±0.03mm) (p>0.05). The SFE increased after different sterilization treatments compared to control group, with the rank of 30.41mJ/m2 (Group C) < 34.52mJ/m2 (Group S) < 37.38mJ/m2 (Group UV) < 43.28mJ/m2 (Group γ). SEM revealed the surface morphological of zirconia appeared to be similar in all groups except in group UV, which appears to be more flat with less pits and shallow grooves than the other three groups. XRD showed that only tetragonal (T) phase structure could be detected on all the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: It seems to be steam autoclave sterilization is the best sterilization method to preserve the best aesthetic outcome for zirconia.
DescriptionPoster Session - Current Dental Ceramics: Mechanical Properties, Adaptation & Adhesion: no. 0406
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/232191

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHan, A-
dc.contributor.authorTsoi, JKH-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Z-
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, J-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T05:28:21Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-20T05:28:21Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe 94th General Session and Exhibition of the IADR, 3rd Meeting of the IADR Asia Pacific Region and 35th Annual Meeting of the IADR Korean Dicision, Seoul, Korea, 22-25 June 2016.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/232191-
dc.descriptionPoster Session - Current Dental Ceramics: Mechanical Properties, Adaptation & Adhesion: no. 0406-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the aesthetic outcomes of zirconia surface using different sterilization methods. METHODS: Forty eight zirconia disks (Y-TZP, Cercon, Dentsply) were cut (diameter 25mm, thickness 1mm), prepared and polished to the same surface roughness (Ra~0.2mm) by profilometer. The specimen were then exposed to steam autoclave sterilization (Group S), UV irradiation (Group UV) and gamma ray irradiation (Group γ). After the treatments, zirconia surface were characterized and compared with the control group (i.e. without any sterilization treatment, Group C) by colour using naked eye under 6500K light illumination, surface roughness, surface free energies (SFE), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). RESULTS: The colour of the white zirconia sample did not have obvious changes in Group S compared to Group C. However, the colour of the zirconia changed to light yellow in Group UV and dark brown in Group γ. Surface roughness result showed the highest mean Ra value (0.61±0.04mm) in Group γ, which was significantly higher than all the other four groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the other three groups of group C (0.24±0.08mm), group S (0.22±0.08mm), and group UV (0.18±0.03mm) (p>0.05). The SFE increased after different sterilization treatments compared to control group, with the rank of 30.41mJ/m2 (Group C) < 34.52mJ/m2 (Group S) < 37.38mJ/m2 (Group UV) < 43.28mJ/m2 (Group γ). SEM revealed the surface morphological of zirconia appeared to be similar in all groups except in group UV, which appears to be more flat with less pits and shallow grooves than the other three groups. XRD showed that only tetragonal (T) phase structure could be detected on all the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: It seems to be steam autoclave sterilization is the best sterilization method to preserve the best aesthetic outcome for zirconia. -
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofGeneral Session of the International Association for Dental Research, IADR 2016-
dc.titleAesthetic outcomes of zirconia surface using different sterilization methods-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailTsoi, JKH: jkhtsoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChen, Z: dentczf@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, J: jpmat@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTsoi, JKH=rp01609-
dc.identifier.authorityMatinlinna, J=rp00052-
dc.identifier.hkuros263881-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats