File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Reconciling actual and perceived rates of predation by domestic cats

TitleReconciling actual and perceived rates of predation by domestic cats
Authors
KeywordsStakeholder conflict
Wildlife conservation
Predation
Owner perception
Domestic cats
Cat regulation
Issue Date2015
Citation
Ecology and Evolution, 2015, v. 5, n. 14, p. 2745-2753 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.The predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus) is a complex problem: Cats are popular companion animals in modern society but are also acknowledged predators of birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and small mammals. A comprehensive understanding of this conservation issue demands an understanding of both the ecological consequence of owning a domestic cat and the attitudes of cat owners. Here, we determine whether cat owners are aware of the predatory behavior of their cats, using data collected from 86 cats in two UK villages. We examine whether the amount of prey their cat returns influences the attitudes of 45 cat owners toward the broader issue of domestic cat predation. We also contribute to the wider understanding of physiological, spatial, and behavioral drivers of prey returns among cats. We find an association between actual prey returns and owner predictions at the coarse scale of predatory/nonpredatory behavior, but no correlation between the observed and predicted prey-return rates among predatory cats. Cat owners generally disagreed with the statement that cats are harmful to wildlife, and disfavored all mitigation options apart from neutering. These attitudes were uncorrelated with the predatory behavior of their cats. Cat owners failed to perceive the magnitude of their cats' impacts on wildlife and were not influenced by ecological information. Management options for the mitigation of cat predation appear unlikely to work if they focus on "predation awareness" campaigns or restrictions of cat freedom. We consider both the ecological consequence of owning a domestic cat and the attitudes of cat owners. Our findings suggest cat owners fail to perceive the magnitude of their cats' impacts on wildlife, with no correlation between the observed and predicted prey return rates among predatory cats. On the basis of opinions of cat owners in this study, management options for the mitigation of cat predation appear unlikely to work if they focus on "predation awareness" campaigns, or restrictions of cat freedom.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230997

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Jennifer L.-
dc.contributor.authorMaclean, Mairead-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Matthew R.-
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Dave J.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T06:07:20Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-01T06:07:20Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationEcology and Evolution, 2015, v. 5, n. 14, p. 2745-2753-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230997-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.The predation of wildlife by domestic cats (Felis catus) is a complex problem: Cats are popular companion animals in modern society but are also acknowledged predators of birds, herpetofauna, invertebrates, and small mammals. A comprehensive understanding of this conservation issue demands an understanding of both the ecological consequence of owning a domestic cat and the attitudes of cat owners. Here, we determine whether cat owners are aware of the predatory behavior of their cats, using data collected from 86 cats in two UK villages. We examine whether the amount of prey their cat returns influences the attitudes of 45 cat owners toward the broader issue of domestic cat predation. We also contribute to the wider understanding of physiological, spatial, and behavioral drivers of prey returns among cats. We find an association between actual prey returns and owner predictions at the coarse scale of predatory/nonpredatory behavior, but no correlation between the observed and predicted prey-return rates among predatory cats. Cat owners generally disagreed with the statement that cats are harmful to wildlife, and disfavored all mitigation options apart from neutering. These attitudes were uncorrelated with the predatory behavior of their cats. Cat owners failed to perceive the magnitude of their cats' impacts on wildlife and were not influenced by ecological information. Management options for the mitigation of cat predation appear unlikely to work if they focus on "predation awareness" campaigns or restrictions of cat freedom. We consider both the ecological consequence of owning a domestic cat and the attitudes of cat owners. Our findings suggest cat owners fail to perceive the magnitude of their cats' impacts on wildlife, with no correlation between the observed and predicted prey return rates among predatory cats. On the basis of opinions of cat owners in this study, management options for the mitigation of cat predation appear unlikely to work if they focus on "predation awareness" campaigns, or restrictions of cat freedom.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEcology and Evolution-
dc.subjectStakeholder conflict-
dc.subjectWildlife conservation-
dc.subjectPredation-
dc.subjectOwner perception-
dc.subjectDomestic cats-
dc.subjectCat regulation-
dc.titleReconciling actual and perceived rates of predation by domestic cats-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.1553-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84937630950-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue14-
dc.identifier.spage2745-
dc.identifier.epage2753-
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7758-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats