File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Benefits of fibre retention osseous resective surgery in the treatment of shallow infrabony defects. A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial describing clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes

TitleBenefits of fibre retention osseous resective surgery in the treatment of shallow infrabony defects. A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial describing clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes
Authors
KeywordsBone loss/Periodontal
Periodontal Pocket
Periodontitis/surgery
Periodontitis/therapy
Randomized Clinical Trial
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2013, v. 40, n. 2, p. 163-171 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Apically Positioned Flap with Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS) or Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) to treat periodontal pockets associated with infrabony defect ≤3 mm at posterior natural teeth. Material and methods Thirty patients with chronic periodontitis showing persistent periodontal pockets after cause-related therapy were enrolled; 15 patients were randomly assigned to FibReORS (test group) and 15 to ORS (control group). Measurements were performed by a blind and calibrated examiner. Outcome measures included intra-operative and post-operative morbidity and root sensitivity, 1-year probing depth (PD), gingival recession (Rec) and radiographic bone changes. Results No differences in clinical and bone defect parameters were observed at baseline. Marginal bone resection was reduced by 0.9-1.6 mm in the FibReORS group. ORS was associated with patient perception of greater surgical hardship (p = 0.0264), higher 1-week pain experience (p = 0.0001) and greater dental hypersensitivity (p = 0.0002). After 1 year, shallow, maintainable PD with no difference between the two procedures (p = 0.3707) was obtained. FibReORS was associated with less final Rec (p < 0.0001) and less radiographic bone loss (p < 0.0001) than ORS. Dental hypersensitivity remained significantly higher in the ORS group (p = 0.0024). Conclusion FibReORS was similarly effective as ORS for PD reduction with less final Rec and patient morbidity. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230916
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.915
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.848

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCairo, Francesco-
dc.contributor.authorCarnevale, Gianfranco-
dc.contributor.authorNieri, Michele-
dc.contributor.authorMervelt, Jana-
dc.contributor.authorCincinelli, Sandro-
dc.contributor.authorMartinolli, Chiara-
dc.contributor.authorPini-Prato, Giovan Paolo-
dc.contributor.authorTonetti, Maurizio S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T06:07:08Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-01T06:07:08Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2013, v. 40, n. 2, p. 163-171-
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/230916-
dc.description.abstractBackground The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of Apically Positioned Flap with Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS) or Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) to treat periodontal pockets associated with infrabony defect ≤3 mm at posterior natural teeth. Material and methods Thirty patients with chronic periodontitis showing persistent periodontal pockets after cause-related therapy were enrolled; 15 patients were randomly assigned to FibReORS (test group) and 15 to ORS (control group). Measurements were performed by a blind and calibrated examiner. Outcome measures included intra-operative and post-operative morbidity and root sensitivity, 1-year probing depth (PD), gingival recession (Rec) and radiographic bone changes. Results No differences in clinical and bone defect parameters were observed at baseline. Marginal bone resection was reduced by 0.9-1.6 mm in the FibReORS group. ORS was associated with patient perception of greater surgical hardship (p = 0.0264), higher 1-week pain experience (p = 0.0001) and greater dental hypersensitivity (p = 0.0002). After 1 year, shallow, maintainable PD with no difference between the two procedures (p = 0.3707) was obtained. FibReORS was associated with less final Rec (p < 0.0001) and less radiographic bone loss (p < 0.0001) than ORS. Dental hypersensitivity remained significantly higher in the ORS group (p = 0.0024). Conclusion FibReORS was similarly effective as ORS for PD reduction with less final Rec and patient morbidity. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontology-
dc.subjectBone loss/Periodontal-
dc.subjectPeriodontal Pocket-
dc.subjectPeriodontitis/surgery-
dc.subjectPeriodontitis/therapy-
dc.subjectRandomized Clinical Trial-
dc.titleBenefits of fibre retention osseous resective surgery in the treatment of shallow infrabony defects. A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial describing clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.12042-
dc.identifier.pmid23252480-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84872265162-
dc.identifier.volume40-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage163-
dc.identifier.epage171-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-051X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats