File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Law and Religion in traditional and contemporary China

TitleLaw and Religion in traditional and contemporary China
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherUnivserity of Adelaide.
Citation
18th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association Australia (ASAA), University of Adelaide, Australia, 5-8 July 2010 How to Cite?
AbstractSynopsis: Historically, three religions played a role in traditional China: two home-grown (Confucianism and Daoism) and one imported (Buddhism). Because each of the three religions were less organized and more diffuse, perceiving law and state in different ways, their interaction with law in China is unlike similar interactions in the West. While over time they competed with each other for dominance, they ultimately integrated in a syncretised form. Still, no matter which religion and in what form dominated, religion was at all times a legitimizing tool of the dynastic monarchs. Understanding this history has implications for the contemporary relationship between law and religion in China. While the concepts of law and state in China may have undergone fundamental changes, the relationship between law and religion might have changed little since traditional times. Chinese Communist rule, at various times, has attempted to marginalize or even to eliminate religion; yet, the legitimising function of religion may once again be emerging in the modern governance of China, especially in light of the moral vacuum in Chinese society following the collapse of the „civil religion‟ of Communism. This lecture will examine the nature of law and religion in traditional and contemporary China and explore how far the interactions between the two are different in the traditional and contemporary ages. It will look into the factors that may explain the similarities or contribute to the dissimilarities.
DescriptionPublic lecture (Jointly sponsored by the Asian Studies Association of Australia 18th Biennial Conference 2010)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228291

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTai, BYT-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-08T02:28:10Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-08T02:28:10Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citation18th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association Australia (ASAA), University of Adelaide, Australia, 5-8 July 2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228291-
dc.descriptionPublic lecture (Jointly sponsored by the Asian Studies Association of Australia 18th Biennial Conference 2010)-
dc.description.abstractSynopsis: Historically, three religions played a role in traditional China: two home-grown (Confucianism and Daoism) and one imported (Buddhism). Because each of the three religions were less organized and more diffuse, perceiving law and state in different ways, their interaction with law in China is unlike similar interactions in the West. While over time they competed with each other for dominance, they ultimately integrated in a syncretised form. Still, no matter which religion and in what form dominated, religion was at all times a legitimizing tool of the dynastic monarchs. Understanding this history has implications for the contemporary relationship between law and religion in China. While the concepts of law and state in China may have undergone fundamental changes, the relationship between law and religion might have changed little since traditional times. Chinese Communist rule, at various times, has attempted to marginalize or even to eliminate religion; yet, the legitimising function of religion may once again be emerging in the modern governance of China, especially in light of the moral vacuum in Chinese society following the collapse of the „civil religion‟ of Communism. This lecture will examine the nature of law and religion in traditional and contemporary China and explore how far the interactions between the two are different in the traditional and contemporary ages. It will look into the factors that may explain the similarities or contribute to the dissimilarities.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUnivserity of Adelaide. -
dc.relation.ispartofBiennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association Australia (ASAA)-
dc.titleLaw and Religion in traditional and contemporary China-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailTai, BYT: yttai@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTai, BYT=rp01271-
dc.identifier.hkuros201672-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats