File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An analysis of undergraduate ophthalmology training in Canada

TitleAn analysis of undergraduate ophthalmology training in Canada
Authors
KeywordsCurriculum
Issue Date2009
Citation
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, v. 44, n. 5, p. 513-518 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To investigate the adequacy of undergraduate ophthalmology education in Canada in comparison with the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) guidelines. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: First-year residents who had graduated from Canadian medical schools. Methods: Eligible residents were invited to participate in an online survey in 2007. Data were categorized by demographic variables, and basic statistics were done. Results: Responses were obtained from 386 of the 1425 individuals (27.0%) contacted. The majority (64.0%) stated they had "too little" or "no exposure" to ophthalmology in medical school. The majority (76.2%) of respondents stated that they had had 1 week or less of overall exposure to ophthalmology. Sufficient exposure to several ICO core subspecialty areas was reported, including lens/cataract (81.1%) and cornea/external diseases (81.6%); however, some areas did not receive adequate time allocation, such as vitreoretinal disease (41.9%). Similarly, competency was obtained in certain ICO examination skills, including assessment of visual acuity (83.3%) and pupillary reflexes (90.7%) but was not achieved for other skills, such as fundoscopy (52.3%), slit-lamp examination (44.8%), and intraocular pressure assessment (19.9%). When asked whether sufficient ophthalmology knowledge and skills had been obtained during medical school, only 42.9% and 25.9% agreed, respectively. Conclusions: Undergraduate ophthalmology training in Canada contains gaps in certain key areas. Developing a national, standardized curriculum could ensure that medical students acquire competency in the ophthalmology knowledge and skills required for future clinical practice.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228085
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.592
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.612
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNoble, Jason-
dc.contributor.authorSomal, Kirandeep-
dc.contributor.authorGill, Harmeet S.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Wai Ching-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T06:45:09Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-01T06:45:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009, v. 44, n. 5, p. 513-518-
dc.identifier.issn0008-4182-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/228085-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the adequacy of undergraduate ophthalmology education in Canada in comparison with the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) guidelines. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: First-year residents who had graduated from Canadian medical schools. Methods: Eligible residents were invited to participate in an online survey in 2007. Data were categorized by demographic variables, and basic statistics were done. Results: Responses were obtained from 386 of the 1425 individuals (27.0%) contacted. The majority (64.0%) stated they had "too little" or "no exposure" to ophthalmology in medical school. The majority (76.2%) of respondents stated that they had had 1 week or less of overall exposure to ophthalmology. Sufficient exposure to several ICO core subspecialty areas was reported, including lens/cataract (81.1%) and cornea/external diseases (81.6%); however, some areas did not receive adequate time allocation, such as vitreoretinal disease (41.9%). Similarly, competency was obtained in certain ICO examination skills, including assessment of visual acuity (83.3%) and pupillary reflexes (90.7%) but was not achieved for other skills, such as fundoscopy (52.3%), slit-lamp examination (44.8%), and intraocular pressure assessment (19.9%). When asked whether sufficient ophthalmology knowledge and skills had been obtained during medical school, only 42.9% and 25.9% agreed, respectively. Conclusions: Undergraduate ophthalmology training in Canada contains gaps in certain key areas. Developing a national, standardized curriculum could ensure that medical students acquire competency in the ophthalmology knowledge and skills required for future clinical practice.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology-
dc.subjectCurriculum-
dc.titleAn analysis of undergraduate ophthalmology training in Canada-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3129/i09-127-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-70349443561-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage513-
dc.identifier.epage518-
dc.identifier.eissn1715-3360-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000271085900006-
dc.identifier.issnl0008-4182-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats