File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Further evidence on dimension-specific lateral inhibition in visual search

TitleFurther evidence on dimension-specific lateral inhibition in visual search
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. The Journal's web site is located at http://wwwjournalofvisionorg/
Citation
The 10th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL, 7-12 May 2010. In Journal of Vision, 2010, v. 10 n. 7, p. 1276 How to Cite?
AbstractLast year, we reported preliminary evidence that suggests that representations of neighboring search items on the same perceptual dimension inhibit each other (Chan & Hayward, VSS 2009). This year, we report further results from 4 experiments to strengthen and refine this notion. To tease apart a distance effect from a hemifield effect, we always put the target and the singletons in the same hemifield. We studied dimension-specific spatial interaction between two ‘special’ search items - a target and a singleton in Experiments 1 and 2, and two singletons in Experiments 3 and 4, by manipulating inter-item distance. For the target-singleton experiments, since mutual inhibition between target and singleton reduces target signal, search should be slowed and result in a stronger “attentional capture”. For the two-singleton experiments, mutual inhibition between singletons reduces their distractions, causing a weaker capture. As such, inter-item inhibition can be measured in terms of capture. In the experiments, we found stronger signs of mutual inhibition for close items than for mid/far items, when they were defined by the same dimension. No such signs were found for different-dimension items. This confirms that lateral inhibition occurs on a dimension-specific map. However, even at mid/far distances where lateral inhibition was at floor, capture was still larger for two singletons of different dimensions. This suggests that the lack of spatial inhibition across dimensional maps is not the only reason that two singletons of different dimensions produce stronger capture. We speculate that non-spatial dimension-specific inhibition also takes place, so that signals of irrelevant dimensions are inhibited. However, inhibition is limited to one dimension at a time, and so is not effective for avoiding capture from two dimensions simultaneously.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/224134
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.341
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.042

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, KH-
dc.contributor.authorHayward, WG-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-24T06:25:46Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-24T06:25:46Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationThe 10th Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Naples, FL, 7-12 May 2010. In Journal of Vision, 2010, v. 10 n. 7, p. 1276-
dc.identifier.issn1534-7362-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/224134-
dc.description.abstractLast year, we reported preliminary evidence that suggests that representations of neighboring search items on the same perceptual dimension inhibit each other (Chan & Hayward, VSS 2009). This year, we report further results from 4 experiments to strengthen and refine this notion. To tease apart a distance effect from a hemifield effect, we always put the target and the singletons in the same hemifield. We studied dimension-specific spatial interaction between two ‘special’ search items - a target and a singleton in Experiments 1 and 2, and two singletons in Experiments 3 and 4, by manipulating inter-item distance. For the target-singleton experiments, since mutual inhibition between target and singleton reduces target signal, search should be slowed and result in a stronger “attentional capture”. For the two-singleton experiments, mutual inhibition between singletons reduces their distractions, causing a weaker capture. As such, inter-item inhibition can be measured in terms of capture. In the experiments, we found stronger signs of mutual inhibition for close items than for mid/far items, when they were defined by the same dimension. No such signs were found for different-dimension items. This confirms that lateral inhibition occurs on a dimension-specific map. However, even at mid/far distances where lateral inhibition was at floor, capture was still larger for two singletons of different dimensions. This suggests that the lack of spatial inhibition across dimensional maps is not the only reason that two singletons of different dimensions produce stronger capture. We speculate that non-spatial dimension-specific inhibition also takes place, so that signals of irrelevant dimensions are inhibited. However, inhibition is limited to one dimension at a time, and so is not effective for avoiding capture from two dimensions simultaneously.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. The Journal's web site is located at http://wwwjournalofvisionorg/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Vision-
dc.titleFurther evidence on dimension-specific lateral inhibition in visual search-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChan, KH: clouis@graduate.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHayward, WG: whayward@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, KH=rp00851-
dc.identifier.authorityHayward, WG=rp00630-
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/10.7.1276-
dc.identifier.hkuros171189-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1276-
dc.identifier.epage1276-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats