File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Geologic correlation of the Himalayan orogen and Indian craton: Part 2. Structural geology, geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the eastern Himalaya

TitleGeologic correlation of the Himalayan orogen and Indian craton: Part 2. Structural geology, geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the eastern Himalaya
Authors
Issue Date2010
Citation
Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 2010, v. 122, n. 3-4, p. 360-395 How to Cite?
AbstractDespite being the largest active collisional orogen on Earth, the growth mechanism of the Himalaya remains uncertain. Current debate has focused on the role of dynamic inter action between tectonics and climate and mass exchanges between the Himalayan and Tibetan crust during Cenozoic India-Asia collision. A major uncertainty in the debate comes from the lack of geologic information on the eastern segment of the Himalayas from 91°E to 97°E, which makes up about one-quarter of the mountain belt. To address this issue, we conducted detailed field mapping, U-Pb zircon age dating, and 40Ar/39Ar thermo chronology along two geologic traverses at longitudes of 92°E and 94°E across the eastern Himalaya. Our dating indicates the region experienced magmatic events at 1745-1760 Ma, 825-878 Ma, 480-520 Ma, and 28-20 Ma. The first three events also occurred in the northeastern Indian craton, while the last is unique to the Hima laya. Correlation of magmatic events and age-equivalent lithologic units suggests that the eastern segment of the Himalaya was constructed in situ by basement-involved thrusting, which is inconsistent with the hypothesis of high-grade Himalaya rocks derived from Tibet via channel flow. The Main Central thrust in the eastern Himalaya forms the roof of a major thrust duplex; its northern part was initiated at ca. 13 Ma, while the southern part was initiated at ca. 10 Ma, as indicated by 40Ar/39Ar thermochronom etry. Crustal thickening of the Main Central thrust hanging wall was expressed by discrete ductile thrusting between 12 Ma and 7 Ma, overlapping in time with motion on the Main Central thrust below. Restoration of two possible geologic cross sections from one of our geologic traverses, where one assumes the existence of pre-Cenozoic deformation below the Himalaya and the other assumes flat-lying strata prior to the India-Asia collision, leads to estimated shortening of 775 km (~76% strain) and 515 km (~70% strain), respectively. We favor the presence of significant basement topog raphy below the eastern Himalaya based on projections of early Paleo zoic structures from the Shillong Plateau (i.e., the Central Shillong thrust) located ~50 km south of our study area. Since northeastern India and possibly the eastern Himalaya both experienced early Paleozoic contraction, the estimated shortening from this study may have resulted from a combined effect of early Paleozoic and Cenozoic deformation. © 2009 Geological Society of America.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/224025
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.332
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.299

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYin, An-
dc.contributor.authorDubey, C. S.-
dc.contributor.authorKelty, T. K.-
dc.contributor.authorWebb, A. A G-
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, T. M.-
dc.contributor.authorChou, C. Y.-
dc.contributor.authorCélérier, Julien-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-18T06:20:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-18T06:20:44Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationBulletin of the Geological Society of America, 2010, v. 122, n. 3-4, p. 360-395-
dc.identifier.issn0016-7606-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/224025-
dc.description.abstractDespite being the largest active collisional orogen on Earth, the growth mechanism of the Himalaya remains uncertain. Current debate has focused on the role of dynamic inter action between tectonics and climate and mass exchanges between the Himalayan and Tibetan crust during Cenozoic India-Asia collision. A major uncertainty in the debate comes from the lack of geologic information on the eastern segment of the Himalayas from 91°E to 97°E, which makes up about one-quarter of the mountain belt. To address this issue, we conducted detailed field mapping, U-Pb zircon age dating, and 40Ar/39Ar thermo chronology along two geologic traverses at longitudes of 92°E and 94°E across the eastern Himalaya. Our dating indicates the region experienced magmatic events at 1745-1760 Ma, 825-878 Ma, 480-520 Ma, and 28-20 Ma. The first three events also occurred in the northeastern Indian craton, while the last is unique to the Hima laya. Correlation of magmatic events and age-equivalent lithologic units suggests that the eastern segment of the Himalaya was constructed in situ by basement-involved thrusting, which is inconsistent with the hypothesis of high-grade Himalaya rocks derived from Tibet via channel flow. The Main Central thrust in the eastern Himalaya forms the roof of a major thrust duplex; its northern part was initiated at ca. 13 Ma, while the southern part was initiated at ca. 10 Ma, as indicated by 40Ar/39Ar thermochronom etry. Crustal thickening of the Main Central thrust hanging wall was expressed by discrete ductile thrusting between 12 Ma and 7 Ma, overlapping in time with motion on the Main Central thrust below. Restoration of two possible geologic cross sections from one of our geologic traverses, where one assumes the existence of pre-Cenozoic deformation below the Himalaya and the other assumes flat-lying strata prior to the India-Asia collision, leads to estimated shortening of 775 km (~76% strain) and 515 km (~70% strain), respectively. We favor the presence of significant basement topog raphy below the eastern Himalaya based on projections of early Paleo zoic structures from the Shillong Plateau (i.e., the Central Shillong thrust) located ~50 km south of our study area. Since northeastern India and possibly the eastern Himalaya both experienced early Paleozoic contraction, the estimated shortening from this study may have resulted from a combined effect of early Paleozoic and Cenozoic deformation. © 2009 Geological Society of America.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBulletin of the Geological Society of America-
dc.titleGeologic correlation of the Himalayan orogen and Indian craton: Part 2. Structural geology, geochronology, and tectonic evolution of the eastern Himalaya-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1130/B26461.1-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77950988609-
dc.identifier.volume122-
dc.identifier.issue3-4-
dc.identifier.spage360-
dc.identifier.epage395-
dc.identifier.eissn0016-7606-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats