File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Phonological profiles of 2-year-olds with delayed language development: Predicting clinical outcomes at age 3

TitlePhonological profiles of 2-year-olds with delayed language development: Predicting clinical outcomes at age 3
Authors
KeywordsPhonological development
Clinical outcome
Language delay
Toddlers
Issue Date2003
Citation
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2003, v. 12, n. 1, p. 28-39 How to Cite?
AbstractTwenty-eight 2-year-olds were screened for language development using the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) and underwent a clinical evaluation within a month following LDS administration. Six measures of phonological development were derived from 20-min language samples of parent-child play interactions, including number of different consonants, number of different consonants in the initial and final positions, number of different consonant clusters in the initial and final position, and percentage of closed syllables shapes. Comparisons were made among 3 groups: (a) those who screened positive on the LDS (LDS+) who were within normal limits on follow-up, (b) those who were identified as language delayed (LD), and (c) children who were language normal (LN). Results revealed that children who were LDS+ and LD had comparable phonetic profiles. The LD group had significantly lower scores on all phonetic measures tested, as compared to the LN group. Clinical recommendations were available on a subset of 13 children who were reassessed at age 3. Children who received "monitor" or "treatment" recommendations at age 3 had significantly lower z scores on measures of phonetic development recorded at 2 years of age than toddlers who received a recommendation of "no concerns" at 3 years. Our preliminary findings indicated that the more delayed the 2-year-old child was in phonological development, the more at risk the child was for continuing delays at age 3.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/221422
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.413
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.867

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarson, CP-
dc.contributor.authorKlee, T-
dc.contributor.authorCarson, DK-
dc.contributor.authorHime, LK-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-19T03:36:56Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-19T03:36:56Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2003, v. 12, n. 1, p. 28-39-
dc.identifier.issn1058-0360-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/221422-
dc.description.abstractTwenty-eight 2-year-olds were screened for language development using the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) and underwent a clinical evaluation within a month following LDS administration. Six measures of phonological development were derived from 20-min language samples of parent-child play interactions, including number of different consonants, number of different consonants in the initial and final positions, number of different consonant clusters in the initial and final position, and percentage of closed syllables shapes. Comparisons were made among 3 groups: (a) those who screened positive on the LDS (LDS+) who were within normal limits on follow-up, (b) those who were identified as language delayed (LD), and (c) children who were language normal (LN). Results revealed that children who were LDS+ and LD had comparable phonetic profiles. The LD group had significantly lower scores on all phonetic measures tested, as compared to the LN group. Clinical recommendations were available on a subset of 13 children who were reassessed at age 3. Children who received "monitor" or "treatment" recommendations at age 3 had significantly lower z scores on measures of phonetic development recorded at 2 years of age than toddlers who received a recommendation of "no concerns" at 3 years. Our preliminary findings indicated that the more delayed the 2-year-old child was in phonological development, the more at risk the child was for continuing delays at age 3.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology-
dc.subjectPhonological development-
dc.subjectClinical outcome-
dc.subjectLanguage delay-
dc.subjectToddlers-
dc.titlePhonological profiles of 2-year-olds with delayed language development: Predicting clinical outcomes at age 3-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid12680811-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0344211877-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage28-
dc.identifier.epage39-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats