File Download
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Sentencing

TitleSentencing
Authors
KeywordsHong Kong
Sentencing law
Criminal law
Issue Date2016
PublisherRoutledge
Citation
Sentencing. In Chui, EWH and Lo TW (Eds.), Understanding Criminal Justice in Hong Kong, 2nd edition. USA: Routledge, 2016 How to Cite?
AbstractConstitutional norms, statutory rules and common law principles govern the art and science of sentencing in Hong Kong. Death penalty and corporal punishments are sentencing measures of the past. As reflected in a 2014 law reform report on suspended sentences, the emphasis now is on discretionary sentencing, although murder still carries a mandatory life imprisonment. Hong Kong courts have a full range of sentencing options to ensure that the punishment fits the crime and offender. Sentencing decisions are informed by traditional purposes of punishment including public protection, deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and reparation for victims. The purpose of denunciation has been cited by judges more frequently in recent years. Restorative justice, however, is not commonly referred to. Hong Kong’s Court of Appeal provides guideline sentences for specific offences; such guidelines assist courts in setting the starting point sentence in a particular case. Aggravating and mitigating factors serve respectively to move the sentence marker up and down. While proportionality is an applied constitutional principle of sentencing, courts still enhance sentences in cases of prevalent organised crime and routinely give sentencing discounts on pleas of guilty or for assistance given to the authorities.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/219342
ISBN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, SNM-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-22T09:06:10Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-22T09:06:10Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationSentencing. In Chui, EWH and Lo TW (Eds.), Understanding Criminal Justice in Hong Kong, 2nd edition. USA: Routledge, 2016-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-13-888875-3-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/219342-
dc.description.abstractConstitutional norms, statutory rules and common law principles govern the art and science of sentencing in Hong Kong. Death penalty and corporal punishments are sentencing measures of the past. As reflected in a 2014 law reform report on suspended sentences, the emphasis now is on discretionary sentencing, although murder still carries a mandatory life imprisonment. Hong Kong courts have a full range of sentencing options to ensure that the punishment fits the crime and offender. Sentencing decisions are informed by traditional purposes of punishment including public protection, deterrence, retribution, rehabilitation and reparation for victims. The purpose of denunciation has been cited by judges more frequently in recent years. Restorative justice, however, is not commonly referred to. Hong Kong’s Court of Appeal provides guideline sentences for specific offences; such guidelines assist courts in setting the starting point sentence in a particular case. Aggravating and mitigating factors serve respectively to move the sentence marker up and down. While proportionality is an applied constitutional principle of sentencing, courts still enhance sentences in cases of prevalent organised crime and routinely give sentencing discounts on pleas of guilty or for assistance given to the authorities.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge-
dc.relation.ispartofUnderstanding Criminal Justice in Hong Kong, 2nd edition-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectSentencing law-
dc.subjectCriminal law-
dc.titleSentencing-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailYoung, SNM: snmyoung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYoung, SNM=rp01275-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.publisher.placeUSA-
dc.identifier.ssrn2655492-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2015/034-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats