File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Über die unüberwundenen Begründungsdefizite der „Kritischen Theorie“ – Von Habermas zu Forst

TitleÜber die unüberwundenen Begründungsdefizite der „Kritischen Theorie“ – Von Habermas zu Forst
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zksp
Citation
Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie, 2015, v. 2 n. 1, p. 67-100 How to Cite?
AbstractIn the first part of this paper I argue that there is hardly one correct step within the chains of arguments by which Habermas tries to substantiate his theory of communicative action, discourse ethics, and his theory of social order. In the second part of the paper I address Rainer Forst’s “principle of justification,” from which he seeks to deduce his ‘right to justification’ on which a “right to justification” is supposed to be based. I argue that Forst himself does not really justify his views but instead offers merely unwarranted stipulations. Moreover, I demonstrate that his theory is unclear, incoherent, inapplicable, and thus practically irrelevant.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/218830
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSteinhoff, UB-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-18T06:54:24Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-18T06:54:24Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationZeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie, 2015, v. 2 n. 1, p. 67-100-
dc.identifier.issn2194-5632-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/218830-
dc.description.abstractIn the first part of this paper I argue that there is hardly one correct step within the chains of arguments by which Habermas tries to substantiate his theory of communicative action, discourse ethics, and his theory of social order. In the second part of the paper I address Rainer Forst’s “principle of justification,” from which he seeks to deduce his ‘right to justification’ on which a “right to justification” is supposed to be based. I argue that Forst himself does not really justify his views but instead offers merely unwarranted stipulations. Moreover, I demonstrate that his theory is unclear, incoherent, inapplicable, and thus practically irrelevant.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zksp-
dc.relation.ispartofZeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie-
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at www.degruyter.com-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.titleÜber die unüberwundenen Begründungsdefizite der „Kritischen Theorie“ – Von Habermas zu Forst-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSteinhoff, UB: ustnhoff@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authoritySteinhoff, UB=rp00610-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/zksp-2015-0004-
dc.identifier.hkuros250772-
dc.identifier.volume2-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage67-
dc.identifier.epage100-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats