File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Can China Develop a Viable Cross-Border Securitization Market?

TitleCan China Develop a Viable Cross-Border Securitization Market?
Authors
KeywordsStudies
Securitization
Regulatory agencies
Commingled funds
Regulation of financial institutions
Issue Date2015
PublisherInstitutional Investor, Journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iijspf.com
Citation
Journal of Structured Finance, 2015, v. 21 n. 1, p. 95-100 How to Cite?
AbstractThe past year has seen a dramatic pick-up on domestic securitizations in the People's Republic of China (PRC). This article provides an overview of the two main government-sponsored securitization schemes in the PRC-one administered by the China Bank Regulatory Commission (CBRC), the other administered by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). The article mainly focuses on the legal, regulatory, constitutional, and other issues that must be addressed before a viable public crossborder securitization market out of China can be developed. As with many financial initiatives in China, the CBRC and CSRC schemes are fairly new, and as such untested or inadequately tested in PRC courts. Moreover, the CBRC and CSRC regulations are administrative regulations and not statutory law. Concepts such as legal isolation, commingling, and bankruptcy remoteness as they apply to securitizations are new to this market and untested in its courts. From a legal point of view, the single best thing that could happen for a securitization market to develop in China, for both domestic and cross-border transactions, is for the National People's Congress (NPC) to enact a securitization statute as other civil law jurisdictions in Asia, such as Korea, have done.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/217056
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, JH-
dc.contributor.authorGoo, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-18T05:47:06Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-18T05:47:06Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Structured Finance, 2015, v. 21 n. 1, p. 95-100-
dc.identifier.issn1551-9783-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/217056-
dc.description.abstractThe past year has seen a dramatic pick-up on domestic securitizations in the People's Republic of China (PRC). This article provides an overview of the two main government-sponsored securitization schemes in the PRC-one administered by the China Bank Regulatory Commission (CBRC), the other administered by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). The article mainly focuses on the legal, regulatory, constitutional, and other issues that must be addressed before a viable public crossborder securitization market out of China can be developed. As with many financial initiatives in China, the CBRC and CSRC schemes are fairly new, and as such untested or inadequately tested in PRC courts. Moreover, the CBRC and CSRC regulations are administrative regulations and not statutory law. Concepts such as legal isolation, commingling, and bankruptcy remoteness as they apply to securitizations are new to this market and untested in its courts. From a legal point of view, the single best thing that could happen for a securitization market to develop in China, for both domestic and cross-border transactions, is for the National People's Congress (NPC) to enact a securitization statute as other civil law jurisdictions in Asia, such as Korea, have done.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInstitutional Investor, Journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iijspf.com-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Structured Finance-
dc.subjectStudies-
dc.subjectSecuritization-
dc.subjectRegulatory agencies-
dc.subjectCommingled funds-
dc.subjectRegulation of financial institutions-
dc.titleCan China Develop a Viable Cross-Border Securitization Market?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGoo, SH: shgoo@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGoo, SH=rp01248-
dc.identifier.hkuros253328-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage95-
dc.identifier.epage100-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats