File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Treatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe

TitleTreatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe
Authors
KeywordsEndodontic
Time
Magnifying loupe
Clinical trial
Root canal therapy
Issue Date2015
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcoralhealth/
Citation
BMC Oral Health, 2015, v. 15, article no. 40 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Use of magnifying loupe may increase the efficiency of dental care. This clinical trial compared the time in performing non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without the use of a magnifying loupe. Methods: Patients who required primary endodontic treatment in clinical trial centres at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in Hong Kong and Peking University (PKU) in Beijing were invited to participate in this study. Two HKU dentists and 2 PKU dentists, forming 2 pairs of dentists with similar years of clinical experience, performed endodontic treatments according to the same procedures and used the same materials, either in single or multiple visits. They had no prior experience with the use of a magnifying loupe. One dentist from each pair was trained to use a magnifying loupe (x2.5). The treatment time was recorded. Results: Eighty-four PKU patients with a mean age of 42.8 years and 98 HKU patients with a mean age of 46.0 years were recruited in this study. Ninety-six teeth were treated with a magnifying loupe and 86 teeth were treated without a magnifying loupe. The results showed that treatment time was not associated with age, gender, tooth vitality, or the presence of apical radiolucency or sinus tract. The results of ANCOVA revealed the treatment time was associated with the clinic (HKU or PKU), root canal system (single or multiple), presence of preoperative pain, treatment visit (single or multiple), the use of a magnifying loupe, and the experience of the operator. Conclusion: In this study, the use of a magnifying loupe could significantly reduce the endodontic treatment time. Trial registration: Clinical Trials ChiCTR-IOR-15005988 registered 15 February 2015.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/215034
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.747
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.868
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, AWY-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, X-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, S-
dc.contributor.authorLi, SKY-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, C-
dc.contributor.authorChu, CH-
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-21T12:20:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-21T12:20:15Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Oral Health, 2015, v. 15, article no. 40-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/215034-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Use of magnifying loupe may increase the efficiency of dental care. This clinical trial compared the time in performing non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without the use of a magnifying loupe. Methods: Patients who required primary endodontic treatment in clinical trial centres at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) in Hong Kong and Peking University (PKU) in Beijing were invited to participate in this study. Two HKU dentists and 2 PKU dentists, forming 2 pairs of dentists with similar years of clinical experience, performed endodontic treatments according to the same procedures and used the same materials, either in single or multiple visits. They had no prior experience with the use of a magnifying loupe. One dentist from each pair was trained to use a magnifying loupe (x2.5). The treatment time was recorded. Results: Eighty-four PKU patients with a mean age of 42.8 years and 98 HKU patients with a mean age of 46.0 years were recruited in this study. Ninety-six teeth were treated with a magnifying loupe and 86 teeth were treated without a magnifying loupe. The results showed that treatment time was not associated with age, gender, tooth vitality, or the presence of apical radiolucency or sinus tract. The results of ANCOVA revealed the treatment time was associated with the clinic (HKU or PKU), root canal system (single or multiple), presence of preoperative pain, treatment visit (single or multiple), the use of a magnifying loupe, and the experience of the operator. Conclusion: In this study, the use of a magnifying loupe could significantly reduce the endodontic treatment time. Trial registration: Clinical Trials ChiCTR-IOR-15005988 registered 15 February 2015.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcoralhealth/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Oral Health-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEndodontic-
dc.subjectTime-
dc.subjectMagnifying loupe-
dc.subjectClinical trial-
dc.subjectRoot canal therapy-
dc.titleTreatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, AWY: drawong@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, S: zhangsn@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLi, SKY: skyli@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, C: zhangcf@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChu, CH: chchu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, AWY=rp02769-
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, C=rp01408-
dc.identifier.authorityChu, CH=rp00022-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-015-0025-7-
dc.identifier.pmid25887978-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4374292-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84925459839-
dc.identifier.hkuros247562-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 40-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 40-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6831-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000351570000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1472-6831-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats