File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessing in-class participation for EFL: Considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles

TitleAssessing in-class participation for EFL: Considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherSpringerOpen.
Citation
Language Testing in Asia, 2015, v. 5, article no. 9 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study investigates the effectiveness and fairness of teacher-led assessment of students' in class participation and its effect on language test scores, taking into account the diversity of second language learners' learning styles. The level of participation was measured across ten criteria over a one-semester period in four classes of beginner and intermediate level adult Korean students of English as a foreign language (EFL). The classes were divided into two test groups who had their level of participation assessed as part of their overall grade (n=76) and two control groups whose participation was measured covertly according to the same criteria (n=65), alongside a pre- and post-course general English proficiency test (the Oxford Quick Placement Test), and a questionnaire designed to ascertain a learner’s general learning style orientation. The results suggest a broad range of learning styles may be found even in mono-cultural language learning groups, dispelling the stereotype of the 'quiet', 'rote-learning' Asian student. There were only minor differences between test and control groups in terms of proficiency test scores and participation levels, suggesting that including participation as a measure of course achievement has little impact on performance. Learners with individualistic learning styles generally achieved lower proficiency test and participation scores than those with styles suited to in-class interaction. However, we also report partial evidence of improved proficiency test scores for learners with group-oriented learning styles at the expense of learners with individualistic learning styles in the test group (and vice-versa in the control group), an effect of pedagogy known as the 'meshing hypothesis' - a hypothesis that has often been criticised in the learning styles literature. The results suggest that including in-class participation as part of a measure of achievement for EFL courses may be both ineffective and unfair for those with certain learning styles, and greater care must be afforded to promote inclusivity of assessment practices given the diversity of learning styles that might be present within a given cohort.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/212360

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrosthwaite, PR-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-21T02:33:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-21T02:33:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationLanguage Testing in Asia, 2015, v. 5, article no. 9-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/212360-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the effectiveness and fairness of teacher-led assessment of students' in class participation and its effect on language test scores, taking into account the diversity of second language learners' learning styles. The level of participation was measured across ten criteria over a one-semester period in four classes of beginner and intermediate level adult Korean students of English as a foreign language (EFL). The classes were divided into two test groups who had their level of participation assessed as part of their overall grade (n=76) and two control groups whose participation was measured covertly according to the same criteria (n=65), alongside a pre- and post-course general English proficiency test (the Oxford Quick Placement Test), and a questionnaire designed to ascertain a learner’s general learning style orientation. The results suggest a broad range of learning styles may be found even in mono-cultural language learning groups, dispelling the stereotype of the 'quiet', 'rote-learning' Asian student. There were only minor differences between test and control groups in terms of proficiency test scores and participation levels, suggesting that including participation as a measure of course achievement has little impact on performance. Learners with individualistic learning styles generally achieved lower proficiency test and participation scores than those with styles suited to in-class interaction. However, we also report partial evidence of improved proficiency test scores for learners with group-oriented learning styles at the expense of learners with individualistic learning styles in the test group (and vice-versa in the control group), an effect of pedagogy known as the 'meshing hypothesis' - a hypothesis that has often been criticised in the learning styles literature. The results suggest that including in-class participation as part of a measure of achievement for EFL courses may be both ineffective and unfair for those with certain learning styles, and greater care must be afforded to promote inclusivity of assessment practices given the diversity of learning styles that might be present within a given cohort.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringerOpen.-
dc.relation.ispartofLanguage Testing in Asia-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.titleAssessing in-class participation for EFL: Considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCrosthwaite, PR: drprc80@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCrosthwaite, PR=rp01961-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40468-015-0017-1-
dc.identifier.hkuros244640-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 9-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 9-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats