File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Carbon Credits As EU Like It: Property, Immunity, TragiCO2medy?

TitleCarbon Credits As EU Like It: Property, Immunity, TragiCO2medy?
Authors
KeywordsCarbon credits
Property
Registry
Fraud
Issue Date2015
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jel.oxfordjournals.org/
Citation
Journal of Environmental Law, 2015, p. 1-29 How to Cite?
AbstractWhile there have been many legal studies of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, few have considered the effectiveness of the EU ETS as a matter of private law design. The authors propose to do so by tracing the history of the scheme, studying the English decision of Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2013] Ch 156, as well as analysing the new EU Registry Regulations promulgated since then. We conclude that the EU ETS is handicapped by conceptual failings and exposes participants to unnecessary uncertainty that national courts will find difficult to resolve.
DescriptionThis paper also appears in Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 52/2015
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/211525
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.814
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.457
SSRN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLow, K-
dc.contributor.authorLin, JSW-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-16T05:56:53Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-16T05:56:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Law, 2015, p. 1-29-
dc.identifier.issn0952-8873-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/211525-
dc.descriptionThis paper also appears in Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 52/2015-
dc.description.abstractWhile there have been many legal studies of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, few have considered the effectiveness of the EU ETS as a matter of private law design. The authors propose to do so by tracing the history of the scheme, studying the English decision of Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2013] Ch 156, as well as analysing the new EU Registry Regulations promulgated since then. We conclude that the EU ETS is handicapped by conceptual failings and exposes participants to unnecessary uncertainty that national courts will find difficult to resolve.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jel.oxfordjournals.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Law-
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Environmental Law following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Journal of Environmental Law, 2015, p. 1-29 is available online at: http://jel.oxfordjournals.org/.-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectCarbon credits-
dc.subjectProperty-
dc.subjectRegistry-
dc.subjectFraud-
dc.titleCarbon Credits As EU Like It: Property, Immunity, TragiCO2medy?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLin, JSW: jolene@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLin, JSW=rp01262-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jel/eqv020-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84948157590-
dc.identifier.hkuros247003-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage29-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000363985500001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.ssrn2627950-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2015/022-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats