File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)

TitleInternational consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.annalsofsurgery.com
Citation
Annals of Surgery, 2015, Epub ahead of print How to Cite?
AbstractINTRODUCTION:: Perioperative complications influence long- and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. The absence of a standardized system for defining and recording complications and quality measures after esophageal resection has meant that there is wide variation in evaluating their impact on these outcomes. METHODS:: The Esophageal Complications Consensus Group comprised 21 high-volume esophageal surgeons from 14 countries, supported by all the major thoracic and upper gastrointestinal professional societies. Delphi surveys and group meetings were used to achieve a consensus on standardized methods for defining complications and quality measures that could be collected in institutional databases and national audits. RESULTS:: A standardized list of complications was created to provide a template for recording individual complications associated with esophagectomy. Where possible, these were linked to preexisting international definitions. A Delphi survey facilitated production of specific definitions for anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, chyle leak, and recurrent nerve palsy. An additional Delphi survey documented consensus regarding critical quality parameters recommended for routine inclusion in databases. These quality parameters were documentation on mortality, comorbidities, completeness of data collection, blood transfusion, grading of complication severity, changes in level of care, discharge location, and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS:: The proposed system for defining and recording perioperative complications associated with esophagectomy provides an infrastructure to standardize international data collection and facilitate future comparative studies and quality improvement projects.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210827
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 8.569
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.503

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLow, DE-
dc.contributor.authorAlderson, D-
dc.contributor.authorCecconello, I-
dc.contributor.authorChang, AC-
dc.contributor.authorDarling, GE-
dc.contributor.authorD'Joruno, XB-
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, SM-
dc.contributor.authorHofstetter, WL-
dc.contributor.authorJobe, BA-
dc.contributor.authorKitagawa, Y-
dc.contributor.authorKucharcauk, JC-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, SYK-
dc.contributor.authorLerut, TE-
dc.contributor.authorMaynard, N-
dc.contributor.authorPera, M-
dc.contributor.authorPeters, JH-
dc.contributor.authorPramesh, CS-
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, JV-
dc.contributor.authorSmithers, BM-
dc.contributor.authorvan Lanschot, JJ-
dc.contributor.authorvan Lanschot, JJB-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T05:56:00Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-23T05:56:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgery, 2015, Epub ahead of print-
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210827-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION:: Perioperative complications influence long- and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. The absence of a standardized system for defining and recording complications and quality measures after esophageal resection has meant that there is wide variation in evaluating their impact on these outcomes. METHODS:: The Esophageal Complications Consensus Group comprised 21 high-volume esophageal surgeons from 14 countries, supported by all the major thoracic and upper gastrointestinal professional societies. Delphi surveys and group meetings were used to achieve a consensus on standardized methods for defining complications and quality measures that could be collected in institutional databases and national audits. RESULTS:: A standardized list of complications was created to provide a template for recording individual complications associated with esophagectomy. Where possible, these were linked to preexisting international definitions. A Delphi survey facilitated production of specific definitions for anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, chyle leak, and recurrent nerve palsy. An additional Delphi survey documented consensus regarding critical quality parameters recommended for routine inclusion in databases. These quality parameters were documentation on mortality, comorbidities, completeness of data collection, blood transfusion, grading of complication severity, changes in level of care, discharge location, and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS:: The proposed system for defining and recording perioperative complications associated with esophagectomy provides an infrastructure to standardize international data collection and facilitate future comparative studies and quality improvement projects.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.annalsofsurgery.com-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Surgery-
dc.titleInternational consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLaw, SYK: slaw@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLaw, SYK=rp00437-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA0000000000001098-
dc.identifier.pmid25607756-
dc.identifier.hkuros244182-
dc.identifier.volumeEpub ahead of print-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats