File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Analysis and democracy: The antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation

TitleAnalysis and democracy: The antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation
Authors
Issue Date2011
Citation
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2011, v. 29, n. 6, p. 958-974 How to Cite?
AbstractAs a political institution, open deliberation on public policy can enhance legitimacy and procedural justice. As a science, decision-aiding deliberative procedures can help overcome bounded rationality of individuals. Integrating the two modes of inquiry would be perfect for capturing the plural values of the environment. However, the analytic requirements seem to point in a different direction from the political ideals. Legitimacy problems arise when the supposedly unconstrained process is professionally 'guided'. But rigorous decision aids fail to work without some degree of cognitive guidance. A trend in ecosystems valuation research is the use of analytic techniques in the deliberative processes of value articulation. In this paper an analytic-deliberative approach is assessed against a deliberative democracy theory. This approach seeks to facilitate deliberation within individuals and to engineer preference towards instrumental rationality. The evaluative framework allows predetermination of the range of outcomes. Little room has been made for value debates, thus the moral need for actual discussion is weak. Being expert centred, the framework provides constricted spaces for empowerment. Alternative expressions unintelligible to the science may be put at a disadvantage. The scope for a reflexive democratic institution appears limited. A promising deliberative valuation approach should be integrative, including analytic and political elements as complementary to each other, and should be democratic in its production. © 2011 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210081
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.664
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.568

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLo, Alex Y.-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-22T06:06:32Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-22T06:06:32Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2011, v. 29, n. 6, p. 958-974-
dc.identifier.issn0263-774X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210081-
dc.description.abstractAs a political institution, open deliberation on public policy can enhance legitimacy and procedural justice. As a science, decision-aiding deliberative procedures can help overcome bounded rationality of individuals. Integrating the two modes of inquiry would be perfect for capturing the plural values of the environment. However, the analytic requirements seem to point in a different direction from the political ideals. Legitimacy problems arise when the supposedly unconstrained process is professionally 'guided'. But rigorous decision aids fail to work without some degree of cognitive guidance. A trend in ecosystems valuation research is the use of analytic techniques in the deliberative processes of value articulation. In this paper an analytic-deliberative approach is assessed against a deliberative democracy theory. This approach seeks to facilitate deliberation within individuals and to engineer preference towards instrumental rationality. The evaluative framework allows predetermination of the range of outcomes. Little room has been made for value debates, thus the moral need for actual discussion is weak. Being expert centred, the framework provides constricted spaces for empowerment. Alternative expressions unintelligible to the science may be put at a disadvantage. The scope for a reflexive democratic institution appears limited. A promising deliberative valuation approach should be integrative, including analytic and political elements as complementary to each other, and should be democratic in its production. © 2011 Pion Ltd and its Licensors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy-
dc.titleAnalysis and democracy: The antecedents of the deliberative approach of ecosystems valuation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1068/c1083-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-82855169123-
dc.identifier.hkuros243561-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage958-
dc.identifier.epage974-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-3425-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats