File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic + amalgam alloys

TitleClinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic + amalgam alloys
Authors
KeywordsClinical evaluation
Amalgam alloys
Issue Date1994
PublisherAustralian Dental Association Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 1994, v. 39 n. 6, p. 344-347 How to Cite?
AbstractThe clinical performance of GS-80 and Lojic + amalgam alloys was compared with that of Dispersalloy, Valiant PhD, Lojic N and Permite C amalgam alloys over periods of up to three years. The 1114 restorations were placed by one dentist in 23 canine, 418 premolar and 673 molar permanent teeth of 301 adult patients treated in a private practice. Direct and indirect clinical assessments were made of the restorations for failures (there were no true failures), and for the deterioration of four clinical factors. All restorations were rated as being either ‘good’ (A) or ‘adequate’ (B) for each of the four factors which, apart from surface texture, showed some slight but statistically-significant clinical deterioration with time. Lojic + and Permite C showed clinically slight but statistically more surface roughness and marginal fracture, while Lojic + and GS-80 showed more surface tarnishing, than did the other alloys. There were no statistically significant differences between the alloys for marginal staining.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/209166
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmales, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorGerke, DC-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-01T08:24:12Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-01T08:24:12Z-
dc.date.issued1994-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 1994, v. 39 n. 6, p. 344-347-
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/209166-
dc.description.abstractThe clinical performance of GS-80 and Lojic + amalgam alloys was compared with that of Dispersalloy, Valiant PhD, Lojic N and Permite C amalgam alloys over periods of up to three years. The 1114 restorations were placed by one dentist in 23 canine, 418 premolar and 673 molar permanent teeth of 301 adult patients treated in a private practice. Direct and indirect clinical assessments were made of the restorations for failures (there were no true failures), and for the deterioration of four clinical factors. All restorations were rated as being either ‘good’ (A) or ‘adequate’ (B) for each of the four factors which, apart from surface texture, showed some slight but statistically-significant clinical deterioration with time. Lojic + and Permite C showed clinically slight but statistically more surface roughness and marginal fracture, while Lojic + and GS-80 showed more surface tarnishing, than did the other alloys. There were no statistically significant differences between the alloys for marginal staining.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAustralian Dental Association Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421-
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journal-
dc.subjectClinical evaluation-
dc.subjectAmalgam alloys-
dc.titleClinical behaviour over three years of GS-80 and Lojic + amalgam alloys-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailSmales, RJ: rjsmales@hkusub.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1834-7819.1994.tb03103.x-
dc.identifier.hkuros636-
dc.identifier.volume39-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage344-
dc.identifier.epage347-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats