File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Reliability and validity of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) in high school students in Wenchuan earthquake area

TitleReliability and validity of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) in high school students in Wenchuan earthquake area
心理健康自評問卷在地震災區學生中使用的信效度
Authors
KeywordsSelf-reporting questionnaire 20 (心理健康自評問卷)
High school student (中學生)
Reliability (信度)
Validity (效度)
Psychometric study (心理測量學研究)
Issue Date2010
PublisherZhongguo Xin Li Wei Sheng Za Zhi She (中國心理衛生協會). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cmhj.cn/
Citation
Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2010, v. 24 n. 4, p. 313-317 How to Cite?
中國心理衛生雜誌 , 2010, v. 24 n. 4, p. 313-317 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective:To provide information about some of the psychometric characteristics of Self-Reporting Questionnaire(SRQ-20,Chinese version).Methods:The Chinese verison of SRQ-20 and Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition(BDI-Ⅱ)were administered to 675 students who were about to take the national college entrance exam in Dujiangyan city,three weeks after the earthquake.Kuder-Richardson formulation was employed to estimate the inter-consistency of SRQ-20.And point-biserial correlation was calculated to indicate the item-total consistency.Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factorial construct.Moreover,the test of the association between the scores of SRQ-20 and BDI-Ⅱwas used to provide evidence of convergent construct of this instrument.Results:The KR-20 coefficient of the scale was 0.79.The item-total score correlations varied from 0.34 to 0.60,averagely reached 0.48.The correlation between the score of SRQ-20 and BDI- was 0.70.Exploratory factor analysis yielded a four-factor construct which explained 43.96% of total variance.Except item 1 and 5,the factor loading of the remained items were more than or near to 0.40.Conclusion:The results suggest the consistency reliability and criteria validity of Chinese SRQ-20 are adequate.However,the results of factor analysis from different researches are not consistent.This implies that it’s more advisable to regard the scale as one-dimension rather than use the factor structure as sub-scales.
目的:檢驗心理健康自評問卷(self-reporting questionaire 20,SRQ-20)中文版的信效度。方法:在地震發生3周后,向675名都江堰市高三學生施測了SRQ-20和貝克抑郁量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition,BDI-Ⅱ)。用Kuder-Richardson公式計算SRQ-20內部一致性系數。計算各個項目與總分的點二列相關。用探索性因素分析檢測SRQ-20的因子結構。用SRQ-20和BDI-Ⅱ的相關進行聚合效度的檢驗。結果:KR-20系數為0.79。項目和總分的相關在0.34到0.60之間,平均達到了0.48。SRQ-20和BDI-Ⅱ之間的相關為0.70。探索性因素分析得到4個因子,解釋總方差的43.96%。除了項目1和5,其他項目的因子載荷均高于或接近0.40。結論:心理健康自評問卷的一致性信度和效標關聯效度良好,但其因子結構尚不穩定,暫不適宜將其因子當作子量表應用,而應視為單維處理。
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiang, XH-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Z-
dc.contributor.authorWang, XL-
dc.contributor.authorKan, S-
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-09T07:43:26Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-09T07:43:26Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationChinese Mental Health Journal, 2010, v. 24 n. 4, p. 313-317-
dc.identifier.citation中國心理衛生雜誌 , 2010, v. 24 n. 4, p. 313-317-
dc.identifier.issn1000-6729-
dc.description.abstractObjective:To provide information about some of the psychometric characteristics of Self-Reporting Questionnaire(SRQ-20,Chinese version).Methods:The Chinese verison of SRQ-20 and Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition(BDI-Ⅱ)were administered to 675 students who were about to take the national college entrance exam in Dujiangyan city,three weeks after the earthquake.Kuder-Richardson formulation was employed to estimate the inter-consistency of SRQ-20.And point-biserial correlation was calculated to indicate the item-total consistency.Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factorial construct.Moreover,the test of the association between the scores of SRQ-20 and BDI-Ⅱwas used to provide evidence of convergent construct of this instrument.Results:The KR-20 coefficient of the scale was 0.79.The item-total score correlations varied from 0.34 to 0.60,averagely reached 0.48.The correlation between the score of SRQ-20 and BDI- was 0.70.Exploratory factor analysis yielded a four-factor construct which explained 43.96% of total variance.Except item 1 and 5,the factor loading of the remained items were more than or near to 0.40.Conclusion:The results suggest the consistency reliability and criteria validity of Chinese SRQ-20 are adequate.However,the results of factor analysis from different researches are not consistent.This implies that it’s more advisable to regard the scale as one-dimension rather than use the factor structure as sub-scales.-
dc.description.abstract目的:檢驗心理健康自評問卷(self-reporting questionaire 20,SRQ-20)中文版的信效度。方法:在地震發生3周后,向675名都江堰市高三學生施測了SRQ-20和貝克抑郁量表第二版(Beck Depression Inventory-2nd Edition,BDI-Ⅱ)。用Kuder-Richardson公式計算SRQ-20內部一致性系數。計算各個項目與總分的點二列相關。用探索性因素分析檢測SRQ-20的因子結構。用SRQ-20和BDI-Ⅱ的相關進行聚合效度的檢驗。結果:KR-20系數為0.79。項目和總分的相關在0.34到0.60之間,平均達到了0.48。SRQ-20和BDI-Ⅱ之間的相關為0.70。探索性因素分析得到4個因子,解釋總方差的43.96%。除了項目1和5,其他項目的因子載荷均高于或接近0.40。結論:心理健康自評問卷的一致性信度和效標關聯效度良好,但其因子結構尚不穩定,暫不適宜將其因子當作子量表應用,而應視為單維處理。-
dc.languagechi-
dc.publisherZhongguo Xin Li Wei Sheng Za Zhi She (中國心理衛生協會). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cmhj.cn/-
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Mental Health Journal-
dc.relation.ispartof中國心理衛生雜誌-
dc.subjectSelf-reporting questionnaire 20 (心理健康自評問卷)-
dc.subjectHigh school student (中學生)-
dc.subjectReliability (信度)-
dc.subjectValidity (效度)-
dc.subjectPsychometric study (心理測量學研究)-
dc.titleReliability and validity of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) in high school students in Wenchuan earthquake areaen_US
dc.title心理健康自評問卷在地震災區學生中使用的信效度-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailWang, XL: wangxl1219@gmail.com-
dc.identifier.hkuros172691-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage313-
dc.identifier.epage317-
dc.publisher.placeChina (中國)-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats