File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of two techniques of patient controlled sedation with midazolam

TitleComparison of two techniques of patient controlled sedation with midazolam
Authors
Issue Date1999
PublisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bjom
Citation
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1999, v. 37 n. 6, p. 472-476 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To compare patient-controlled sedation with 1-mg increments of midazolam at 1-min intervals with 0.1-mg increments of midazolam without a lock-out interval. Design: Randomized cross over study.Subjects : 32 patients aged 17–35 years having third molars removed. Results: Doses of midazolam obtained, degree of sedation and operating conditions were similar in the two groups. The demands far exceeded the increments actually received by patients obtaining 0.1-mg increments. Some were extremely sedated with both techniques. Conclusions: In this age group, there were no significant advantages or disadvantages of one technique over the other. Patients obtained the degree of sedation they required to undergo the operation by pressing the button independently of the dose or incremental interval. So-called ‘true’ patient-controlled sedation is a misnomer. The cut-off interval proved to be an extremely important safety feature.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205844
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.237
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.887
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodrigo, MRC-
dc.contributor.authorFung, SC-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-14T06:42:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-14T06:42:52Z-
dc.date.issued1999-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1999, v. 37 n. 6, p. 472-476-
dc.identifier.issn0266-4356-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205844-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare patient-controlled sedation with 1-mg increments of midazolam at 1-min intervals with 0.1-mg increments of midazolam without a lock-out interval. Design: Randomized cross over study.Subjects : 32 patients aged 17–35 years having third molars removed. Results: Doses of midazolam obtained, degree of sedation and operating conditions were similar in the two groups. The demands far exceeded the increments actually received by patients obtaining 0.1-mg increments. Some were extremely sedated with both techniques. Conclusions: In this age group, there were no significant advantages or disadvantages of one technique over the other. Patients obtained the degree of sedation they required to undergo the operation by pressing the button independently of the dose or incremental interval. So-called ‘true’ patient-controlled sedation is a misnomer. The cut-off interval proved to be an extremely important safety feature.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bjom-
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-
dc.subject.meshAnalgesia, Patient-Controlled-
dc.subject.meshAnesthesia, Dental - methods-
dc.subject.meshHypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage-
dc.subject.meshMidazolam - administration & dosage-
dc.subject.meshMolar, Third - surgery-
dc.titleComparison of two techniques of patient controlled sedation with midazolamen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1054/bjom.1999.0118-
dc.identifier.pmid10687910-
dc.identifier.hkuros48907-
dc.identifier.volume37-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage472-
dc.identifier.epage476-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000084833300011-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats