File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Conservation implications of divergent global patterns of ant and vertebrate diversity

TitleConservation implications of divergent global patterns of ant and vertebrate diversity
Authors
KeywordsAnts
Vertebrates
Species richness
Genera
Conservation planning
Biodiversity patterns
Issue Date2013
Citation
Diversity and Distributions, 2013, v. 19, n. 8, p. 1084-1092 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: Global conservation planning is often oriented around vertebrates and plants, yet most organisms are invertebrates. To explore the potential conservation implications of this bias, we assessed how well patterns of diversity for an influential group of invertebrates, the ants, correspond with those of three vertebrate groups (birds, mammals and amphibians). Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data on the number of genera of ants and the three vertebrate groups for 370 political regions across the world. We then compared their correlations both for overall diversity and between subsets of genera likely to be of conservation concern. We also developed generalized additive models (GAM) to identify regions where vertebrates and ants diverged in their diversity patterns. Results: While ant and vertebrate diversity do positively correlate, the correlations are substantially weaker for the ant lineages of the greatest conservation concern. Vertebrates also notably fail to predict ant diversity in specific geographic areas, including Australia and Southeast Asia, parts of Africa and Madagascar, and south-western China. These failures may be genuine differences in diversity patterns, or they may indicate important gaps in our knowledge of ant and vertebrate diversity. Main conclusions: We conclude that it is currently unwise to assume that global conservation priorities based on vertebrates will conserve ants as well. We suspect that this also applies to other invertebrates. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205786
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.566
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.701
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Clinton Neil-
dc.contributor.authorGuénard, Benoît S.-
dc.contributor.authorDiamond, Sarah E.-
dc.contributor.authorWeiser, Michael D.-
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Robert R.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-06T08:02:21Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-06T08:02:21Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationDiversity and Distributions, 2013, v. 19, n. 8, p. 1084-1092-
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205786-
dc.description.abstractAim: Global conservation planning is often oriented around vertebrates and plants, yet most organisms are invertebrates. To explore the potential conservation implications of this bias, we assessed how well patterns of diversity for an influential group of invertebrates, the ants, correspond with those of three vertebrate groups (birds, mammals and amphibians). Location: Global. Methods: We compiled data on the number of genera of ants and the three vertebrate groups for 370 political regions across the world. We then compared their correlations both for overall diversity and between subsets of genera likely to be of conservation concern. We also developed generalized additive models (GAM) to identify regions where vertebrates and ants diverged in their diversity patterns. Results: While ant and vertebrate diversity do positively correlate, the correlations are substantially weaker for the ant lineages of the greatest conservation concern. Vertebrates also notably fail to predict ant diversity in specific geographic areas, including Australia and Southeast Asia, parts of Africa and Madagascar, and south-western China. These failures may be genuine differences in diversity patterns, or they may indicate important gaps in our knowledge of ant and vertebrate diversity. Main conclusions: We conclude that it is currently unwise to assume that global conservation priorities based on vertebrates will conserve ants as well. We suspect that this also applies to other invertebrates. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofDiversity and Distributions-
dc.subjectAnts-
dc.subjectVertebrates-
dc.subjectSpecies richness-
dc.subjectGenera-
dc.subjectConservation planning-
dc.subjectBiodiversity patterns-
dc.titleConservation implications of divergent global patterns of ant and vertebrate diversity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.12090-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84880136840-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spage1084-
dc.identifier.epage1092-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-4642-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000321444900020-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats