File Download

Conference Paper: Creating paradigm shifts in teaching and assessing law

TitleCreating paradigm shifts in teaching and assessing law
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherThe Baptist University of Hiong Kong.
Citation
The 2014 HERDSA Conference, Hong Kong, China, 7-10 July 2014. How to Cite?
AbstractIncreasing calls on universities to show greater accountability and development of student skills have made universities rethink educational practices, including adopting outcomes-based and authentic learning approaches. While some disciplines find it less difficult to adopt change in their teaching-learning-assessing methodologies, disciplines having longer-established teaching-practice traditions, such as case-based teaching in law, find changing methods challenging and requiring substantially more persuasive lobbying. Changeover in paradigms then needs to overcome both student and staff resistance. Students need to transit from secondary education practices specially in learning and assessment, and teachers from stubbornly-held, long teaching traditions. We showcase questionnaire-survey and interview data from University of Hong Kong students in a tort law course with radically changed teaching and assessment methods, to show that paradigm shifts in learning and assessment became agreeable, even to first year students following large classes (n >100), when teaching and assessment changes occurred in a clearly enunciated, prior-announced, transparent ways and with real-time feedback, that showcased to students the professional long-term skill benefits of changed practices. We also showcase learning and assessment changes that were radical from both student and law teaching viewpoints. For students at entry level, this was their first learning and assessment experiences in the use of self-discovered authentic incidents to independently apply and build analytical legal-reasoning and writing skills at higher cognitive levels on the taxonomies of SOLO and Perry's intellectual development (at relational and relativist levels, respectively). For law teaching, the methods deviated radically from traditional case-based didactic teaching and unseen summative assessment.
DescriptionConference Theme: Higher Education in a Globalized World
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204753

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlofcheski, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorEkaratne, S-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-20T00:36:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-20T00:36:35Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 2014 HERDSA Conference, Hong Kong, China, 7-10 July 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204753-
dc.descriptionConference Theme: Higher Education in a Globalized World-
dc.description.abstractIncreasing calls on universities to show greater accountability and development of student skills have made universities rethink educational practices, including adopting outcomes-based and authentic learning approaches. While some disciplines find it less difficult to adopt change in their teaching-learning-assessing methodologies, disciplines having longer-established teaching-practice traditions, such as case-based teaching in law, find changing methods challenging and requiring substantially more persuasive lobbying. Changeover in paradigms then needs to overcome both student and staff resistance. Students need to transit from secondary education practices specially in learning and assessment, and teachers from stubbornly-held, long teaching traditions. We showcase questionnaire-survey and interview data from University of Hong Kong students in a tort law course with radically changed teaching and assessment methods, to show that paradigm shifts in learning and assessment became agreeable, even to first year students following large classes (n >100), when teaching and assessment changes occurred in a clearly enunciated, prior-announced, transparent ways and with real-time feedback, that showcased to students the professional long-term skill benefits of changed practices. We also showcase learning and assessment changes that were radical from both student and law teaching viewpoints. For students at entry level, this was their first learning and assessment experiences in the use of self-discovered authentic incidents to independently apply and build analytical legal-reasoning and writing skills at higher cognitive levels on the taxonomies of SOLO and Perry's intellectual development (at relational and relativist levels, respectively). For law teaching, the methods deviated radically from traditional case-based didactic teaching and unseen summative assessment.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Baptist University of Hiong Kong.-
dc.relation.ispartofHERDSA Conference 2014en_US
dc.titleCreating paradigm shifts in teaching and assessing lawen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailGlofcheski, R: rick.glofcheski@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityGlofcheski, R=rp01247en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros238714en_US
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats