File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Reconciling Tensions between Excellence, Access and Equity in Multilateral R&D Partnerships: A Canadian Collaborators' Perspective

TitleReconciling Tensions between Excellence, Access and Equity in Multilateral R&D Partnerships: A Canadian Collaborators' Perspective
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.palgrave-journals.com/hep/index.html
Citation
Higher Education Policy (In press), 2015 How to Cite?
AbstractUniversities traverse epistemic, sectoral and geopolitical boundaries with increasing frequency, but along the way encounter challenges in mitigating unequal capacities, soaring costs and proprietary concerns. The bridging of disparate stakeholder interests requires an enormous effort, as research policies, institutional norms and organizational cultures in global science often remain irreconcilable. In seeking to identify strategic leverages for optimal balance in cross-border partnerships, this paper considers the case study of the Structural Genomics Consortium, which represents a synergy of resources, interests and commitments by research universities, governments and industries in Canada, Sweden and the UK. By triangulating data derived from content analysis of institutional materials, interviews and participant observations in Toronto, the study zeros in on the Canadian equilibration of symbolic, cultural and organizational forces aimed at securing long-term stakeholder support across institutional, sectoral and geopolitical domains.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203465

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOleksiyenko, PAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T15:16:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T15:16:51Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationHigher Education Policy (In press), 2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203465-
dc.description.abstractUniversities traverse epistemic, sectoral and geopolitical boundaries with increasing frequency, but along the way encounter challenges in mitigating unequal capacities, soaring costs and proprietary concerns. The bridging of disparate stakeholder interests requires an enormous effort, as research policies, institutional norms and organizational cultures in global science often remain irreconcilable. In seeking to identify strategic leverages for optimal balance in cross-border partnerships, this paper considers the case study of the Structural Genomics Consortium, which represents a synergy of resources, interests and commitments by research universities, governments and industries in Canada, Sweden and the UK. By triangulating data derived from content analysis of institutional materials, interviews and participant observations in Toronto, the study zeros in on the Canadian equilibration of symbolic, cultural and organizational forces aimed at securing long-term stakeholder support across institutional, sectoral and geopolitical domains.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.palgrave-journals.com/hep/index.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education Policyen_US
dc.rightsHigher Education Policy . Copyright © Palgrave Macmillan.en_US
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in [insert journal title XXX here]. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: [insert URL here]en_US
dc.titleReconciling Tensions between Excellence, Access and Equity in Multilateral R&D Partnerships: A Canadian Collaborators' Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailOleksiyenko, PA: paoleks@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityOleksiyenko, PA=rp00945en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/hep.2014.5-
dc.identifier.hkuros236283en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats