File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: BIPES, a cost-effective high-throughput method for assessing microbial diversity

TitleBIPES, a cost-effective high-throughput method for assessing microbial diversity
Authors
Keywords16S
BIPES
Illumina
microbial diversity
Solexa
V6
Issue Date2011
Citation
ISME Journal, 2011, v. 5 n. 4, p. 741-749 How to Cite?
AbstractPyrosequencing of 16S rRNA (16S) variable tags has become the most popular method for assessing microbial diversity, but the method remains costly for the evaluation of large numbers of environmental samples with high sequencing depths. We developed a barcoded Illumina paired-end (PE) sequencing (BIPES) method that sequences each 16S V6 tag from both ends on the Illumina HiSeq 2000, and the PE reads are then overlapped to obtain the V6 tag. The average accuracy of Illumina single-end (SE) reads was only 97.9%, which decreased from approximately 99.9% at the start of the read to less than 85% at the end of the read; nevertheless, overlapping of the PE reads significantly increased the sequencing accuracy to 99.65% by verifying the 3' end of each SE in which the sequencing quality was degraded. After the removal of tags with two or more mismatches within the medial 40-70 bases of the reads and of tags with any primer errors, the overall base sequencing accuracy of the BIPES reads was further increased to 99.93%. The BIPES reads reflected the amounts of the various tags in the initial template, but long tags and high GC tags were underestimated. The BIPES method yields 20-50 times more 16S V6 tags than does pyrosequencing in a single-flow cell run, and each of the BIPES reads costs less than 1/40 of a pyrosequencing read. As a laborsaving and cost-effective method, BIPES can be routinely used to analyze the microbial ecology of both environmental and human microbiomes.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/202520
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 11.217
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.422
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, HWen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, DFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTam, NFen_US
dc.contributor.authorJiang, XTen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorSheng, HFen_US
dc.contributor.authorQin, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorZou, Fen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T08:25:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T08:25:12Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationISME Journal, 2011, v. 5 n. 4, p. 741-749en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/202520-
dc.description.abstractPyrosequencing of 16S rRNA (16S) variable tags has become the most popular method for assessing microbial diversity, but the method remains costly for the evaluation of large numbers of environmental samples with high sequencing depths. We developed a barcoded Illumina paired-end (PE) sequencing (BIPES) method that sequences each 16S V6 tag from both ends on the Illumina HiSeq 2000, and the PE reads are then overlapped to obtain the V6 tag. The average accuracy of Illumina single-end (SE) reads was only 97.9%, which decreased from approximately 99.9% at the start of the read to less than 85% at the end of the read; nevertheless, overlapping of the PE reads significantly increased the sequencing accuracy to 99.65% by verifying the 3' end of each SE in which the sequencing quality was degraded. After the removal of tags with two or more mismatches within the medial 40-70 bases of the reads and of tags with any primer errors, the overall base sequencing accuracy of the BIPES reads was further increased to 99.93%. The BIPES reads reflected the amounts of the various tags in the initial template, but long tags and high GC tags were underestimated. The BIPES method yields 20-50 times more 16S V6 tags than does pyrosequencing in a single-flow cell run, and each of the BIPES reads costs less than 1/40 of a pyrosequencing read. As a laborsaving and cost-effective method, BIPES can be routinely used to analyze the microbial ecology of both environmental and human microbiomes.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofISME Journalen_US
dc.subject16S-
dc.subjectBIPES-
dc.subjectIllumina-
dc.subjectmicrobial diversity-
dc.subjectSolexa-
dc.subjectV6-
dc.titleBIPES, a cost-effective high-throughput method for assessing microbial diversityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailQin, J: qinjing@hku.hken_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ismej.2010.160en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20962877-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3105743-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79953026036-
dc.identifier.hkuros238357en_US
dc.identifier.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage741en_US
dc.identifier.epage749en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000290021900018-
dc.identifier.issnl1751-7362-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats