File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Assessment of root curvature and distance using computed tomography.

TitleAssessment of root curvature and distance using computed tomography.
Authors
Issue Date2002
Citation
Clinical oral investigations, 2002, v. 6, n. 3, p. 171-174 How to Cite?
AbstractThe safety and efficacy of subgingival root surface instrumentation may be enhanced by optimized adaptation between instrument and treated surface. Thus, detailed knowledge of root geometry may allow advances in instrument design. The aim of this study was therefore to measure root radii of various tooth types as well as distances between tooth roots using computed tomography. Two hundred sixteen teeth in eight patients were studied, with cross sections of teeth at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) being regarded as ellipses. The maximum radii of ellipses were calculated and averaged for each tooth surface within various tooth groups. In addition, the spacing between roots at CEJ level and 5 mm below the CEJ was measured. Mean radii varied from 1.09+/-0.50 mm (lower incisor, lingual) to 13.7+/-0.96 mm (upper molar, mesial). Radii of 1 mm to 6 mm were most frequently found at buccal, palatal, and lingual surfaces, whereas the majority of radii were between 2 mm and 11 mm at mesial and distal sites. Root distance varied between 1.04+/-0.49 mm (lower incisors, CEJ level) and 2.81+/-1.70 mm (lower molars, 5 mm below CEJ). The curvature of an instrument for root surface instrumentation should correspond to a radius of at least 11 mm to achieve maximum adaptation to the treated surface, and the width of the working end should be less than 1 mm to allow sufficient interdental instrumentation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199893

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPetersilka, Gregor J.-
dc.contributor.authorDraenert, Miriam Esther-
dc.contributor.authorJervøe-Storm, Pia Merete-
dc.contributor.authorHeinecke, Achim-
dc.contributor.authorFlemmig, Thomas Frank-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-26T23:10:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-26T23:10:52Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.citationClinical oral investigations, 2002, v. 6, n. 3, p. 171-174-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199893-
dc.description.abstractThe safety and efficacy of subgingival root surface instrumentation may be enhanced by optimized adaptation between instrument and treated surface. Thus, detailed knowledge of root geometry may allow advances in instrument design. The aim of this study was therefore to measure root radii of various tooth types as well as distances between tooth roots using computed tomography. Two hundred sixteen teeth in eight patients were studied, with cross sections of teeth at the level of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) being regarded as ellipses. The maximum radii of ellipses were calculated and averaged for each tooth surface within various tooth groups. In addition, the spacing between roots at CEJ level and 5 mm below the CEJ was measured. Mean radii varied from 1.09+/-0.50 mm (lower incisor, lingual) to 13.7+/-0.96 mm (upper molar, mesial). Radii of 1 mm to 6 mm were most frequently found at buccal, palatal, and lingual surfaces, whereas the majority of radii were between 2 mm and 11 mm at mesial and distal sites. Root distance varied between 1.04+/-0.49 mm (lower incisors, CEJ level) and 2.81+/-1.70 mm (lower molars, 5 mm below CEJ). The curvature of an instrument for root surface instrumentation should correspond to a radius of at least 11 mm to achieve maximum adaptation to the treated surface, and the width of the working end should be less than 1 mm to allow sufficient interdental instrumentation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical oral investigations-
dc.titleAssessment of root curvature and distance using computed tomography.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid12271351-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036718927-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage171-
dc.identifier.epage174-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats