File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Weibull analysis of ceramic-resin bonding using two specimen testing substrates

TitleWeibull analysis of ceramic-resin bonding using two specimen testing substrates
Authors
KeywordsAdhesion
Ceramics and Weibull analysis
Issue Date2014
PublisherSage Publications, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201925
Citation
The 92nd General Session & Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), Cape Town, South Africa, 25-28 June 2014. In Journal of Dental Research, 2014, v. 93 n. Special issue B: abstract no. 302 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: The objective of this study was to analyze results from microtensile bond strength test on ceramic-resin bonding in terms of reliability using Weibull analysis. Method: Ceramic blocks (e.max CAD®, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) were firstly treated with one of two surface treatments: (1) hydrofluoric acid (HF) (IPS Ceramic Etching gel, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) etched followed by silane (Monobond-S, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) application; (2) HF etched, silane applied, followed by heating treatment and an application of an unfilled resin (Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent AG). Two testing models were used according to two testing substrates: ceramic bonded to ceramic with the same surface treatment (C-C) and ceramic bonded to resin composite (C-R). Two resin cements, Variolink II® (Ivoclar Vivadent AG) and Clearfil SA Cement (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), were tested. Each group (n=30) was stored in distilled water for 7 days at 37°C. They were subjected to a tensile force until failure. Mean bond strengths were reported at the IADR-APR session in 2013. The results were subsequently analyzed using Weibull statistics with R 2.12.1 software package and are now presented here. Result: Weibull modulii of the ceramic bonded to resin composite groups were 3.6-7.8 while modulii of ceramic bonded to ceramic groups were 5.1-9.9. Weibull parameters, including the Weibull modulus(β), the 63.2% of the samples expected to fail(η) and the 10.0% of the samples expected to fail(B10), in each ceramic bonded to ceramic group were higher compared to the corresponding group of the ceramic bonded to resin groups. Conclusion: Ceramic bonded to ceramic model is recommended for evaluating the microtensile bond strength of ceramic-resin cement-adhesion by providing more reliable and consistent results as demonstrated by the Weibull analysis.
DescriptionPoster Presentation
Session 66: Processing and Surface Treatment Effects on Ceramic and Cement Properties
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199317
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.602
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.714

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTian, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsoi, KHen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, JPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T01:13:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T01:13:35Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 92nd General Session & Exhibition of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), Cape Town, South Africa, 25-28 June 2014. In Journal of Dental Research, 2014, v. 93 n. Special issue B: abstract no. 302en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199317-
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation-
dc.descriptionSession 66: Processing and Surface Treatment Effects on Ceramic and Cement Properties-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was to analyze results from microtensile bond strength test on ceramic-resin bonding in terms of reliability using Weibull analysis. Method: Ceramic blocks (e.max CAD®, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) were firstly treated with one of two surface treatments: (1) hydrofluoric acid (HF) (IPS Ceramic Etching gel, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) etched followed by silane (Monobond-S, Ivoclar Vivadent AG) application; (2) HF etched, silane applied, followed by heating treatment and an application of an unfilled resin (Heliobond, Ivoclar Vivadent AG). Two testing models were used according to two testing substrates: ceramic bonded to ceramic with the same surface treatment (C-C) and ceramic bonded to resin composite (C-R). Two resin cements, Variolink II® (Ivoclar Vivadent AG) and Clearfil SA Cement (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc.), were tested. Each group (n=30) was stored in distilled water for 7 days at 37°C. They were subjected to a tensile force until failure. Mean bond strengths were reported at the IADR-APR session in 2013. The results were subsequently analyzed using Weibull statistics with R 2.12.1 software package and are now presented here. Result: Weibull modulii of the ceramic bonded to resin composite groups were 3.6-7.8 while modulii of ceramic bonded to ceramic groups were 5.1-9.9. Weibull parameters, including the Weibull modulus(β), the 63.2% of the samples expected to fail(η) and the 10.0% of the samples expected to fail(B10), in each ceramic bonded to ceramic group were higher compared to the corresponding group of the ceramic bonded to resin groups. Conclusion: Ceramic bonded to ceramic model is recommended for evaluating the microtensile bond strength of ceramic-resin cement-adhesion by providing more reliable and consistent results as demonstrated by the Weibull analysis.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201925-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Researchen_US
dc.rightsJournal of Dental Research. Copyright © Sage Publications, Inc..-
dc.subjectAdhesion-
dc.subjectCeramics and Weibull analysis-
dc.titleWeibull analysis of ceramic-resin bonding using two specimen testing substratesen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF: mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailTsoi, KH: jkhtsoi@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, JP: jpmat@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_US
dc.identifier.authorityTsoi, KH=rp01609en_US
dc.identifier.authorityMatinlinna, JP=rp00052en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros230568en_US
dc.identifier.volume93-
dc.identifier.issueSpecial issue B: abstract no. 302-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats