File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of electroconvulsive therapy practice between London and Bengaluru

TitleComparison of electroconvulsive therapy practice between London and Bengaluru
Authors
Issue Date2011
Citation
Journal of ECT, 2011, v. 27 n. 4, p. 275-280 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To compare electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice between London in the United Kingdom and Bengaluru in India. METHODS: A retrospective case note study was conducted to compare patterns of referrals for ECT in university teaching hospitals in London (n = 46) and Bengaluru (n = 345) during a 1-year period. Further comparison of ECT practice was made for a consecutive series of depressed patients between London (n = 104) and Bengaluru (n = 125). RESULTS: The rates of ECT referral were 0.9% of total annual admissions at the London site and 8.2% at the Bengaluru site. At the Bengaluru site, a higher proportion of patients were referred for ECT with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (P < 0.0001). Compared to the Bengaluru sample, depressed patients treated with ECT in London (n = 104) were older with more treatment resistance (P < 0.0001), had longer inpatient stays, and were less responsive to ECT. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of ECT differed substantially between the London and Bengaluru sites. The relatively limited use of ECT in London reflects local treatment guidelines and may reflect the stigma associated with ECT. Electroconvulsive therapy is more widely used in Bengaluru with good outcomes. Further cross-cultural research is required to study the reasons for such contrasting practices and what constitutes the optimal practice of ECT for health systems in different countries. Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/195129
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.833
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.784
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEranti, SV-
dc.contributor.authorThirthalli, J-
dc.contributor.authorPattan, V-
dc.contributor.authorMogg, A-
dc.contributor.authorPluck, G-
dc.contributor.authorVelayudhan, L-
dc.contributor.authorChan, J-
dc.contributor.authorGangadhar, BN-
dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, DM-
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-25T01:40:12Z-
dc.date.available2014-02-25T01:40:12Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of ECT, 2011, v. 27 n. 4, p. 275-280-
dc.identifier.issn1095-0680-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/195129-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) practice between London in the United Kingdom and Bengaluru in India. METHODS: A retrospective case note study was conducted to compare patterns of referrals for ECT in university teaching hospitals in London (n = 46) and Bengaluru (n = 345) during a 1-year period. Further comparison of ECT practice was made for a consecutive series of depressed patients between London (n = 104) and Bengaluru (n = 125). RESULTS: The rates of ECT referral were 0.9% of total annual admissions at the London site and 8.2% at the Bengaluru site. At the Bengaluru site, a higher proportion of patients were referred for ECT with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (P < 0.0001). Compared to the Bengaluru sample, depressed patients treated with ECT in London (n = 104) were older with more treatment resistance (P < 0.0001), had longer inpatient stays, and were less responsive to ECT. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of ECT differed substantially between the London and Bengaluru sites. The relatively limited use of ECT in London reflects local treatment guidelines and may reflect the stigma associated with ECT. Electroconvulsive therapy is more widely used in Bengaluru with good outcomes. Further cross-cultural research is required to study the reasons for such contrasting practices and what constitutes the optimal practice of ECT for health systems in different countries. Copyright © 2011 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of ECT-
dc.titleComparison of electroconvulsive therapy practice between London and Bengaluru-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/YCT.0b013e31820f8f7c-
dc.identifier.pmid21673590-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-82455188012-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage275-
dc.identifier.epage280-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000297910500007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats