File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: The Distinctiveness of a Fashion Monopoly

TitleThe Distinctiveness of a Fashion Monopoly
Authors
KeywordsDistinctiveness
Trademark
Social Justice
Fashion
Issue Date2013
PublisherNew York University, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://jipel.law.nyu.edu/
Citation
Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 3 n. 1, p. 143-196 How to Cite?
AbstractBy focusing on the recent fashion warfare over the red sole used on luxury shoes, this Article reconsiders the implications of trademark protection of single color marks for regulating the development of the fashion industry and the cultural evolution of human society. Courts and commentators have focused on the role of the aesthetic functionality doctrine in deciding whether Christian Louboutin’s red sole mark should be protected by trademark law. This Article takes a different approach. It calls for a social justice-based re-examination of whether the red sole mark is distinctive enough to warrant trademark protection. Based on a close look at the distinctiveness of the red sole mark, the Article puts forward a social justice mandate that should be incorporated into trademark law. It contends that social justice should have the trumping power to deny trademark protection of marks even if they are adequately distinctive. It also shows how the new mandate resonates with the equality-oriented protection under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Article further addresses practical concerns for implementing the mandate and discusses its merit in solving the problems caused by the aesthetic functionality doctrine.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/193114
ISSN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSun, H-
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-18T03:34:58Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-18T03:34:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 3 n. 1, p. 143-196-
dc.identifier.issn2324-6286-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/193114-
dc.description.abstractBy focusing on the recent fashion warfare over the red sole used on luxury shoes, this Article reconsiders the implications of trademark protection of single color marks for regulating the development of the fashion industry and the cultural evolution of human society. Courts and commentators have focused on the role of the aesthetic functionality doctrine in deciding whether Christian Louboutin’s red sole mark should be protected by trademark law. This Article takes a different approach. It calls for a social justice-based re-examination of whether the red sole mark is distinctive enough to warrant trademark protection. Based on a close look at the distinctiveness of the red sole mark, the Article puts forward a social justice mandate that should be incorporated into trademark law. It contends that social justice should have the trumping power to deny trademark protection of marks even if they are adequately distinctive. It also shows how the new mandate resonates with the equality-oriented protection under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Article further addresses practical concerns for implementing the mandate and discusses its merit in solving the problems caused by the aesthetic functionality doctrine.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNew York University, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://jipel.law.nyu.edu/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law-
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.subjectDistinctiveness-
dc.subjectTrademark-
dc.subjectSocial Justice-
dc.subjectFashion-
dc.titleThe Distinctiveness of a Fashion Monopolyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailSun, H: haochen@hku.hk-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.hkuros235974-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.spage143-
dc.identifier.epage196-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.ssrn2363309-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2013/042-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats