File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Characterization of cecal microbiome of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae)

TitleCharacterization of cecal microbiome of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae)
Authors
Keywordsemu
ceca
microbiome
pyrosequencing
Issue Date2012
PublisherFederation of Animal Science Societies (FASS).
Citation
Symposium on Gut Health in Production of Food Animals, Texas, USA, 3-5 December 2012. In the Program and Abstracts of Symposium on Gut Health in Production of Food Animals, p. 19, abstract no. 408 How to Cite?
AbstractEmus (Dromaius novaehollandiae), large flightless ratites native to Australia, are farmed for their fat and meat. They are omnivorous, feeding on a wide variety of plants and insects, preferring high quality items in which nutrients are concentrated. They have a relatively simple gastrointestinal tract, with a relatively short mean digesta retention time. However, despite these limitations, emus are able to digest 35 to 45% of the ingested dietary neutral detergent fiber, which may contribute up to 50% of their maintenance energy requirement. Vertebrates lack endogenous enzymes that are capable of digesting complex carbohydrates and therefore rely on microbial organisms in their gastrointestinal tract to accomplish this. However, nothing is known about the microbial diversity in the emu hindgut. In this study, we evaluated the phylogenetic diversity of the cecal microbiome of 4 emus fed a barley-alfalfa-canola based diet, using 454 pyrotag sequencing after amplification for v3–v5 region of bacterial 16s rRNA gene. After very stringent quality trimming on raw data, 96,118 16S rDNA sequence reads (24,030 ± 2495 reads/sample) with an average read length of 508 bp were generated. A mean 727 (418- 1108) operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonging to 9 bacterial phyla were identified. The most predominant bacterial phyla were Bacteroidetes (44% of total classified diversity), Proteobacteria (39%), Fusobacteria (9%), and Firmicutes (6%). Microbes from the remaining phyla together accounted for less than 1% of the total classified diversity. The estimated microbial richness (Chao1) was 1481 ± 331 OTUs, whereas the Shannon diversity index was 4.5 ± 0.3. These results indicated emus’ ceca may have higher bacterial diversity than that of chickens. This is the first study to characterize the microbial community of the gastrointestinal tract of a ratite using pyrosequencing, providing a baseline for further study.
DescriptionPoster presentation
The Program and Abstracts of the Symposium is located at: http://www.fass.org/guthealth2012/2012_GutHealth_Program_WEB.pdf
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/190677

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBennett, DCen_US
dc.contributor.authorTun, HMen_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, JEen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeung, FCCen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, KMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-17T15:34:50Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-17T15:34:50Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationSymposium on Gut Health in Production of Food Animals, Texas, USA, 3-5 December 2012. In the Program and Abstracts of Symposium on Gut Health in Production of Food Animals, p. 19, abstract no. 408en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/190677-
dc.descriptionPoster presentation-
dc.descriptionThe Program and Abstracts of the Symposium is located at: http://www.fass.org/guthealth2012/2012_GutHealth_Program_WEB.pdf-
dc.description.abstractEmus (Dromaius novaehollandiae), large flightless ratites native to Australia, are farmed for their fat and meat. They are omnivorous, feeding on a wide variety of plants and insects, preferring high quality items in which nutrients are concentrated. They have a relatively simple gastrointestinal tract, with a relatively short mean digesta retention time. However, despite these limitations, emus are able to digest 35 to 45% of the ingested dietary neutral detergent fiber, which may contribute up to 50% of their maintenance energy requirement. Vertebrates lack endogenous enzymes that are capable of digesting complex carbohydrates and therefore rely on microbial organisms in their gastrointestinal tract to accomplish this. However, nothing is known about the microbial diversity in the emu hindgut. In this study, we evaluated the phylogenetic diversity of the cecal microbiome of 4 emus fed a barley-alfalfa-canola based diet, using 454 pyrotag sequencing after amplification for v3–v5 region of bacterial 16s rRNA gene. After very stringent quality trimming on raw data, 96,118 16S rDNA sequence reads (24,030 ± 2495 reads/sample) with an average read length of 508 bp were generated. A mean 727 (418- 1108) operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonging to 9 bacterial phyla were identified. The most predominant bacterial phyla were Bacteroidetes (44% of total classified diversity), Proteobacteria (39%), Fusobacteria (9%), and Firmicutes (6%). Microbes from the remaining phyla together accounted for less than 1% of the total classified diversity. The estimated microbial richness (Chao1) was 1481 ± 331 OTUs, whereas the Shannon diversity index was 4.5 ± 0.3. These results indicated emus’ ceca may have higher bacterial diversity than that of chickens. This is the first study to characterize the microbial community of the gastrointestinal tract of a ratite using pyrosequencing, providing a baseline for further study.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherFederation of Animal Science Societies (FASS).-
dc.relation.ispartofSymposium on Gut Health in Production of Food Animalsen_US
dc.subjectemu-
dc.subjectceca-
dc.subjectmicrobiome-
dc.subjectpyrosequencing-
dc.titleCharacterization of cecal microbiome of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae)en_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailLeung, FCC: fcleung@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, FCC=rp00731en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros225026en_US
dc.identifier.spage19, abstract no. 408-
dc.identifier.epage19, abstract no. 408-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats