File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Authorial Voice in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Perspective

TitleAuthorial Voice in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Perspective
學術文章中的“寫作者聲音”: 基於語料庫的跨學科和語言對比研究
Authors
Keywords寫作者聲音
學科規范力
語言規范力
自我指涉
Issue Date2013
Publisher解放軍外國語學院學報編輯部. The Journal's web site is located at http://c.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical-jfjwgyxyxb.aspx
Citation
解放軍外國語學院學報, 2013, v. 36 n. 4, p. 17-23 How to Cite?
Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2013, v. 36 n. 4, p. 17-23 How to Cite?
Abstract本研究通過包含3個學科(文學、教育學、化學)和兩種語言(中文、英文)的學術文章語料庫,對學術文章中'寫作者聲音'的出現形式及頻率進行了語言間和學科間的對比,發現語言層面上的差異比學科間的差異顯著。這一結論與西方現有的研究結論相悖,即學科規范比語言規范更能約束寫作者在撰寫學術文章時的遣詞酌句,說明由于中西方語言的巨大差異,使得學科的規范力不及語言的規范力。 This paper contrasts the manifestation of authorial identity in English and Chinese research articles across three fields. The study seeks to find patterns governing the use of self-mention devices among native English writers and Chinese writers, and to explain such patterns in terms of self-perception. The paper suggests that English authors have a stronger tendency to use pronominal forms than depersonalized forms. It is also found that in using first-person pronouns, English authors of single-authored papers have a salient preference for the singular rather than the plural, thus forming a sharp contrast with Chinese authors. In term of pattern choice for self-mention, the findings suggest that language regulation is more influential than discipline regulation, which is not in concordance with findings by western scholars.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/190543
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, TKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-17T15:28:13Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-17T15:28:13Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citation解放軍外國語學院學報, 2013, v. 36 n. 4, p. 17-23en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2013, v. 36 n. 4, p. 17-23-
dc.identifier.issn1002-722X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/190543-
dc.description.abstract本研究通過包含3個學科(文學、教育學、化學)和兩種語言(中文、英文)的學術文章語料庫,對學術文章中'寫作者聲音'的出現形式及頻率進行了語言間和學科間的對比,發現語言層面上的差異比學科間的差異顯著。這一結論與西方現有的研究結論相悖,即學科規范比語言規范更能約束寫作者在撰寫學術文章時的遣詞酌句,說明由于中西方語言的巨大差異,使得學科的規范力不及語言的規范力。 This paper contrasts the manifestation of authorial identity in English and Chinese research articles across three fields. The study seeks to find patterns governing the use of self-mention devices among native English writers and Chinese writers, and to explain such patterns in terms of self-perception. The paper suggests that English authors have a stronger tendency to use pronominal forms than depersonalized forms. It is also found that in using first-person pronouns, English authors of single-authored papers have a salient preference for the singular rather than the plural, thus forming a sharp contrast with Chinese authors. In term of pattern choice for self-mention, the findings suggest that language regulation is more influential than discipline regulation, which is not in concordance with findings by western scholars.-
dc.languagechien_US
dc.publisher解放軍外國語學院學報編輯部. The Journal's web site is located at http://c.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical-jfjwgyxyxb.aspxen_US
dc.relation.ispartof解放軍外國語學院學報en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of PLA University of Foreign Languages-
dc.subject寫作者聲音-
dc.subject學科規范力-
dc.subject語言規范力-
dc.subject自我指涉-
dc.titleAuthorial Voice in Academic Writing: A Contrastive Perspectiveen_US
dc.title學術文章中的“寫作者聲音”: 基於語料庫的跨學科和語言對比研究en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLee, TK: leetk@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLee, TK=rp01612en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros223115en_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage17en_US
dc.identifier.epage23en_US
dc.publisher.placeChinaen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats