File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: A Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei

TitleA Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei
幼兒園教師工資待遇比較研究(四) 深圳、香港、臺北幼兒園教師工資待遇比較分析
Authors
Li, HChen, YLin, Y
KeywordsKindergarten teachers (幼兒園教師)
Compensation (工資待遇)
Shenzhen (深圳)
Hong Kong (香港)
Taipei (臺北)
Issue Date2013
PublisherZhejiang Educational Press Group (浙江教育報刊總社). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.zjjybkzs.com/182/257/1.html
Citation
Early Childhood Education, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 How to Cite?
幼兒教育, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 How to Cite?
AbstractThe comparison of kindergarten teacher compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei shows: 1) Hong Kong features the simplest compensation structure, which has no allowance, incentive, or benefits, whereas Taipei has the most comprehensive and generous compensation with Shenzhen between them; 2) Shenzhen and Taipei employ the post performance salary system, whereas Hong Kong uses competency-based salary system; and 3) Taipei teacher has the highest value of compensation, whereas Hong Kong teacher has the least purchasing power. Accordingly, the following suggestions are made for Hong Kong: enrich and improve the teacher compensation system, launch the post performance salary system and introduce the housing, transportation, and education allowances for kindergarten teachers.
分析深圳、香港和臺北三地公辦(非牟利)幼兒園教師的工資待遇發現:(1)香港幼兒園教師的工資架構比較單一,沒有津貼、獎金或福利;臺北幼兒園教師的工資架構最為全面、合理、人性化;深圳介于二者之間。(2)深圳和臺北均采用崗位績效工資制,而香港是名義上的能力工資制。(3)臺北幼兒園教師的工資水平是三地中最高的。在扣除每月房租后,香港幼兒園教師的工資實際購買力最低。針對香港幼兒園教師工資待遇最低的問題,研究者建議香港特區政府進一步完善幼兒園教師的工資架構,考慮采用崗位績效工資制,發放住房、交通、教育等津貼。
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/183845
ISSN
1004-4604

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T04:20:08Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-18T04:20:08Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationEarly Childhood Education, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13en_US
dc.identifier.citation幼兒教育, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13-
dc.identifier.issn1004-4604-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/183845-
dc.description.abstractThe comparison of kindergarten teacher compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei shows: 1) Hong Kong features the simplest compensation structure, which has no allowance, incentive, or benefits, whereas Taipei has the most comprehensive and generous compensation with Shenzhen between them; 2) Shenzhen and Taipei employ the post performance salary system, whereas Hong Kong uses competency-based salary system; and 3) Taipei teacher has the highest value of compensation, whereas Hong Kong teacher has the least purchasing power. Accordingly, the following suggestions are made for Hong Kong: enrich and improve the teacher compensation system, launch the post performance salary system and introduce the housing, transportation, and education allowances for kindergarten teachers.-
dc.description.abstract分析深圳、香港和臺北三地公辦(非牟利)幼兒園教師的工資待遇發現:(1)香港幼兒園教師的工資架構比較單一,沒有津貼、獎金或福利;臺北幼兒園教師的工資架構最為全面、合理、人性化;深圳介于二者之間。(2)深圳和臺北均采用崗位績效工資制,而香港是名義上的能力工資制。(3)臺北幼兒園教師的工資水平是三地中最高的。在扣除每月房租后,香港幼兒園教師的工資實際購買力最低。針對香港幼兒園教師工資待遇最低的問題,研究者建議香港特區政府進一步完善幼兒園教師的工資架構,考慮采用崗位績效工資制,發放住房、交通、教育等津貼。-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherZhejiang Educational Press Group (浙江教育報刊總社). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.zjjybkzs.com/182/257/1.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Childhood Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartof幼兒教育-
dc.subjectKindergarten teachers (幼兒園教師)-
dc.subjectCompensation (工資待遇)-
dc.subjectShenzhen (深圳)-
dc.subjectHong Kong (香港)-
dc.subjectTaipei (臺北)-
dc.titleA Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipeien_US
dc.title幼兒園教師工資待遇比較研究(四) 深圳、香港、臺北幼兒園教師工資待遇比較分析-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLi, H: huili@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLi, H=rp00926en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros214698en_US
dc.identifier.volume577en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage9en_US
dc.identifier.epage13en_US
dc.publisher.placeChina-
dc.identifier.issnl1004-4604-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats