File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: A Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei

TitleA Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei
幼兒園教師工資待遇比較研究(四) 深圳、香港、臺北幼兒園教師工資待遇比較分析
Authors
KeywordsKindergarten teachers (幼兒園教師)
Compensation (工資待遇)
Shenzhen (深圳)
Hong Kong (香港)
Taipei (臺北)
Issue Date2013
PublisherZhejiang Educational Press Group (浙江教育報刊總社). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.zjjybkzs.com/182/257/1.html
Citation
Early Childhood Education, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 How to Cite?
幼兒教育, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 How to Cite?
AbstractThe comparison of kindergarten teacher compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei shows: 1) Hong Kong features the simplest compensation structure, which has no allowance, incentive, or benefits, whereas Taipei has the most comprehensive and generous compensation with Shenzhen between them; 2) Shenzhen and Taipei employ the post performance salary system, whereas Hong Kong uses competency-based salary system; and 3) Taipei teacher has the highest value of compensation, whereas Hong Kong teacher has the least purchasing power. Accordingly, the following suggestions are made for Hong Kong: enrich and improve the teacher compensation system, launch the post performance salary system and introduce the housing, transportation, and education allowances for kindergarten teachers.
分析深圳、香港和臺北三地公辦(非牟利)幼兒園教師的工資待遇發現:(1)香港幼兒園教師的工資架構比較單一,沒有津貼、獎金或福利;臺北幼兒園教師的工資架構最為全面、合理、人性化;深圳介于二者之間。(2)深圳和臺北均采用崗位績效工資制,而香港是名義上的能力工資制。(3)臺北幼兒園教師的工資水平是三地中最高的。在扣除每月房租后,香港幼兒園教師的工資實際購買力最低。針對香港幼兒園教師工資待遇最低的問題,研究者建議香港特區政府進一步完善幼兒園教師的工資架構,考慮采用崗位績效工資制,發放住房、交通、教育等津貼。
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/183845
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T04:20:08Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-18T04:20:08Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationEarly Childhood Education, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13en_US
dc.identifier.citation幼兒教育, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13-
dc.identifier.issn1004-4604-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/183845-
dc.description.abstractThe comparison of kindergarten teacher compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei shows: 1) Hong Kong features the simplest compensation structure, which has no allowance, incentive, or benefits, whereas Taipei has the most comprehensive and generous compensation with Shenzhen between them; 2) Shenzhen and Taipei employ the post performance salary system, whereas Hong Kong uses competency-based salary system; and 3) Taipei teacher has the highest value of compensation, whereas Hong Kong teacher has the least purchasing power. Accordingly, the following suggestions are made for Hong Kong: enrich and improve the teacher compensation system, launch the post performance salary system and introduce the housing, transportation, and education allowances for kindergarten teachers.-
dc.description.abstract分析深圳、香港和臺北三地公辦(非牟利)幼兒園教師的工資待遇發現:(1)香港幼兒園教師的工資架構比較單一,沒有津貼、獎金或福利;臺北幼兒園教師的工資架構最為全面、合理、人性化;深圳介于二者之間。(2)深圳和臺北均采用崗位績效工資制,而香港是名義上的能力工資制。(3)臺北幼兒園教師的工資水平是三地中最高的。在扣除每月房租后,香港幼兒園教師的工資實際購買力最低。針對香港幼兒園教師工資待遇最低的問題,研究者建議香港特區政府進一步完善幼兒園教師的工資架構,考慮采用崗位績效工資制,發放住房、交通、教育等津貼。-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherZhejiang Educational Press Group (浙江教育報刊總社). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.zjjybkzs.com/182/257/1.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Childhood Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartof幼兒教育-
dc.subjectKindergarten teachers (幼兒園教師)-
dc.subjectCompensation (工資待遇)-
dc.subjectShenzhen (深圳)-
dc.subjectHong Kong (香港)-
dc.subjectTaipei (臺北)-
dc.titleA Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipeien_US
dc.title幼兒園教師工資待遇比較研究(四) 深圳、香港、臺北幼兒園教師工資待遇比較分析-
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLi, H: huili@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLi, H=rp00926en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros214698en_US
dc.identifier.volume577en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage9en_US
dc.identifier.epage13en_US
dc.publisher.placeChina-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats