File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Do thinking styles contribute to metacognition beyond self-rated abilities?

TitleDo thinking styles contribute to metacognition beyond self-rated abilities?
Authors
KeywordsMetacognition
Self-Rated Abilities
Thinking Style
Issue Date2010
PublisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01443410.asp
Citation
Educational Psychology, 2010, v. 30 n. 4, p. 481-494 How to Cite?
AbstractThe principal objective of this study was to explore the predictive power of thinking styles for metacognition when self-rated abilities were taken into account. As a preliminary step, the study examined the psychometric properties of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI). Four hundred and twenty-four university students from mainland China responded to the MAI, the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II, and the Self-Rated Ability Scale. The study ascertained the reliability and validity of the MAI. More importantly, results suggested that three creativity-generating styles (hierarchical, liberal and legislative) and the executive style predicted metacognition beyond self-rated abilities. Practical significance of the main research finding was discussed for university faculty members, students and university senior managers. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/175482
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.157
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.750
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, LFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-26T08:58:56Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-26T08:58:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationEducational Psychology, 2010, v. 30 n. 4, p. 481-494en_US
dc.identifier.issn0144-3410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/175482-
dc.description.abstractThe principal objective of this study was to explore the predictive power of thinking styles for metacognition when self-rated abilities were taken into account. As a preliminary step, the study examined the psychometric properties of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI). Four hundred and twenty-four university students from mainland China responded to the MAI, the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II, and the Self-Rated Ability Scale. The study ascertained the reliability and validity of the MAI. More importantly, results suggested that three creativity-generating styles (hierarchical, liberal and legislative) and the executive style predicted metacognition beyond self-rated abilities. Practical significance of the main research finding was discussed for university faculty members, students and university senior managers. © 2010 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01443410.aspen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEducational Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectMetacognitionen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Rated Abilitiesen_US
dc.subjectThinking Styleen_US
dc.titleDo thinking styles contribute to metacognition beyond self-rated abilities?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailZhang, LF: lfzhang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, LF=rp00988en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01443411003659986en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77954742768en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77954742768&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage481en_US
dc.identifier.epage494en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000280153900008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZhang, LF=15039838600en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats