File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction, steam distillation, and solvent extraction techniques for analysis of volatile consituents in Fructus Amomi

TitleComparison of solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction, steam distillation, and solvent extraction techniques for analysis of volatile consituents in Fructus Amomi
Authors
Issue Date2005
Citation
Journal Of Aoac International, 2005, v. 88 n. 2, p. 418-423 How to Cite?
AbstractFour sampling techniques, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), steam distillation (SD), and solvent extraction (SE), were compared for the analysis of volatile constituents from a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) of the dried ripe fruit of Fructus Amomi (Sha Ren). A total of 38 compounds were identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Different SFE and SPME parameters (modifier content, extraction pressure, and temperature for SFE and fibers, extraction temperature, and time for SPME) were studied. The results by SFE and SPME were compared with those obtained by conventional SD and SE methods. The results showed that SFE and SPME are better sample preparation techniques than SD and SE. Due to SFE's requirement for expensive specialized instrumentation, the simplicity, low cost, and speed of SPME make it a more appropriate technique for extraction of volatile constituents in TCMs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/174936
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.918
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.458
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShen, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorSha, Yen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorFu, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-26T08:48:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-26T08:48:14Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Aoac International, 2005, v. 88 n. 2, p. 418-423en_US
dc.identifier.issn1060-3271en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/174936-
dc.description.abstractFour sampling techniques, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), steam distillation (SD), and solvent extraction (SE), were compared for the analysis of volatile constituents from a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) of the dried ripe fruit of Fructus Amomi (Sha Ren). A total of 38 compounds were identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Different SFE and SPME parameters (modifier content, extraction pressure, and temperature for SFE and fibers, extraction temperature, and time for SPME) were studied. The results by SFE and SPME were compared with those obtained by conventional SD and SE methods. The results showed that SFE and SPME are better sample preparation techniques than SD and SE. Due to SFE's requirement for expensive specialized instrumentation, the simplicity, low cost, and speed of SPME make it a more appropriate technique for extraction of volatile constituents in TCMs.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of AOAC Internationalen_US
dc.subject.meshAmomum - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshDrugs, Chinese Herbal - Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshFruit - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshGas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometryen_US
dc.subject.meshIndicators And Reagentsen_US
dc.subject.meshOils - Analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshPlant Extracts - Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.meshSolventsen_US
dc.subject.meshVolatilizationen_US
dc.titleComparison of solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction, steam distillation, and solvent extraction techniques for analysis of volatile consituents in Fructus Amomien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailShen, S: sshen@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityShen, S=rp00775en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid15859065-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-16644375519en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-16644375519&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume88en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage418en_US
dc.identifier.epage423en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000228000600007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShen, S=7403431266en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSha, Y=7102250309en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridDeng, C=7202303343en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFu, D=7201810615en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChen, J=7501879668en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZhang, X=55168993500en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats