File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Investigations into the use of an ultrasonic chisel to cut bone. Part 2: Cutting ability

TitleInvestigations into the use of an ultrasonic chisel to cut bone. Part 2: Cutting ability
Authors
KeywordsBone Cutting
Force Measurement
Oral Surgery
Ultrasonic Chisel
Issue Date2000
PublisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jdent
Citation
Journal Of Dentistry, 2000, v. 28 n. 1, p. 39-44 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Ultrasound may offer a possible alternative to rotary instruments for removing bone. This study was undertaken to analyse in vitro the various factors that influence the cutting of bone by an ultrasonic chisel. Study design: A block of bovine femur was moved in a longitudinal direction under a stationary ultrasonic chisel. The force and depth of the cut was recorded for cutting rates of 28-112 mm/min and with increasing rake angles of 0 to + 20°. The pressure exerted by the chisel was recorded for different cutting rates. Results: When the cutting rate increases there is a corresponding increase in the downward force which is followed by a decrease in the force at rates greater than 56 mm/min. The depth of the cut increases up to a rate of 56 mm/min after which it decreases. Both the longitudinal and downward forces do not change when the rake angle changes from 0 to + 10°. The downward force decreases when the rake angle increases from + 10 to + 20°. Conclusions: The bone is cut slowly with the ultrasonic chisel, but this would assist in precision. Where such an instrument is used for cutting bone the clinicians should be aware that both low forces and cutting rates are required, and the instrument should be held at a low rake angle. © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/174205
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.109
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.029
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhambay, BSen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalmsley, ADen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-22T01:58:32Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-22T01:58:32Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Dentistry, 2000, v. 28 n. 1, p. 39-44en_US
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/174205-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Ultrasound may offer a possible alternative to rotary instruments for removing bone. This study was undertaken to analyse in vitro the various factors that influence the cutting of bone by an ultrasonic chisel. Study design: A block of bovine femur was moved in a longitudinal direction under a stationary ultrasonic chisel. The force and depth of the cut was recorded for cutting rates of 28-112 mm/min and with increasing rake angles of 0 to + 20°. The pressure exerted by the chisel was recorded for different cutting rates. Results: When the cutting rate increases there is a corresponding increase in the downward force which is followed by a decrease in the force at rates greater than 56 mm/min. The depth of the cut increases up to a rate of 56 mm/min after which it decreases. Both the longitudinal and downward forces do not change when the rake angle changes from 0 to + 10°. The downward force decreases when the rake angle increases from + 10 to + 20°. Conclusions: The bone is cut slowly with the ultrasonic chisel, but this would assist in precision. Where such an instrument is used for cutting bone the clinicians should be aware that both low forces and cutting rates are required, and the instrument should be held at a low rake angle. © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jdenten_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectBone Cuttingen_US
dc.subjectForce Measurementen_US
dc.subjectOral Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic Chiselen_US
dc.titleInvestigations into the use of an ultrasonic chisel to cut bone. Part 2: Cutting abilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailKhambay, BS: bkhambay@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityKhambay, BS=rp01691en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00044-5-
dc.identifier.pmid10666960-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0033631667en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033631667&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage39en_US
dc.identifier.epage44en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000083752800006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKhambay, BS=7003979053en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWalmsley, AD=7103287712en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats