File Download
 
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
 
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control study
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleEfficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control study
 
AuthorsLam, KW1
Pun, TC1
Ng, EHY1
Wong, KS1
 
Issue Date2004
 
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG
 
CitationBjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2004, v. 111 n. 4, p. 340-344 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.x
 
AbstractObjective: To compare preemptive analgesia and preclosure analgesia in reducing wound pain after laparoscopic operation. Design: Randomised, double-blind and placebo control. Setting: University referral centre. Population: Infertile women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy with or without additional procedures. Methods: One hundred and forty-four women were randomised to receive 10 mL of 1% lignocaine at the surgical sites before incision and 10 mL of normal saline before closure of incision (the preemptive group), saline before incision and lignocaine before closure of incision (the preclosure group) and saline at the surgical sites both before incision and closure of incision (the placebo group). Main outcome measures: Post-operative wound pain measured by linear visual analogue scale and amount of analgesic use. Results: The women in the preclosure group had significantly lower pain scores at 2, 4 and 24 hours than those in the placebo group, whereas the women in the preemptive group only showed significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours than the placebo group. The pain score at 24 hours in the preclosure group was significantly lower than that in the preemptive group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative analgesic requirement among the three groups. Conclusion: The preclosure analgesia is better than preemptive analgesia and no analgesia in reducing postoperative wound pain.
 
ISSN1470-0328
2013 Impact Factor: 3.862
 
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.x
 
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000220476700010
 
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
 
DC FieldValue
dc.contributor.authorLam, KW
 
dc.contributor.authorPun, TC
 
dc.contributor.authorNg, EHY
 
dc.contributor.authorWong, KS
 
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:29:04Z
 
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:29:04Z
 
dc.date.issued2004
 
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare preemptive analgesia and preclosure analgesia in reducing wound pain after laparoscopic operation. Design: Randomised, double-blind and placebo control. Setting: University referral centre. Population: Infertile women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy with or without additional procedures. Methods: One hundred and forty-four women were randomised to receive 10 mL of 1% lignocaine at the surgical sites before incision and 10 mL of normal saline before closure of incision (the preemptive group), saline before incision and lignocaine before closure of incision (the preclosure group) and saline at the surgical sites both before incision and closure of incision (the placebo group). Main outcome measures: Post-operative wound pain measured by linear visual analogue scale and amount of analgesic use. Results: The women in the preclosure group had significantly lower pain scores at 2, 4 and 24 hours than those in the placebo group, whereas the women in the preemptive group only showed significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours than the placebo group. The pain score at 24 hours in the preclosure group was significantly lower than that in the preemptive group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative analgesic requirement among the three groups. Conclusion: The preclosure analgesia is better than preemptive analgesia and no analgesia in reducing postoperative wound pain.
 
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext
 
dc.identifier.citationBjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2004, v. 111 n. 4, p. 340-344 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.x
 
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.x
 
dc.identifier.epage344
 
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000220476700010
 
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328
2013 Impact Factor: 3.862
 
dc.identifier.issue4
 
dc.identifier.pmid15008770
 
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-1842579455
 
dc.identifier.spage340
 
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/173283
 
dc.identifier.volume111
 
dc.languageeng
 
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG
 
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom
 
dc.relation.ispartofBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
 
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
 
dc.subject.meshAdult
 
dc.subject.meshAnesthetics, Local - Administration & Dosage
 
dc.subject.meshDouble-Blind Method
 
dc.subject.meshFemale
 
dc.subject.meshHumans
 
dc.subject.meshInfertility, Female - Surgery
 
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopy - Adverse Effects
 
dc.subject.meshLidocaine - Administration & Dosage
 
dc.subject.meshPain, Postoperative - Drug Therapy
 
dc.subject.meshWound Healing - Physiology
 
dc.titleEfficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control study
 
dc.typeArticle
 
<?xml encoding="utf-8" version="1.0"?>
<item><contributor.author>Lam, KW</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Pun, TC</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Ng, EHY</contributor.author>
<contributor.author>Wong, KS</contributor.author>
<date.accessioned>2012-10-30T06:29:04Z</date.accessioned>
<date.available>2012-10-30T06:29:04Z</date.available>
<date.issued>2004</date.issued>
<identifier.citation>Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2004, v. 111 n. 4, p. 340-344</identifier.citation>
<identifier.issn>1470-0328</identifier.issn>
<identifier.uri>http://hdl.handle.net/10722/173283</identifier.uri>
<description.abstract>Objective: To compare preemptive analgesia and preclosure analgesia in reducing wound pain after laparoscopic operation. Design: Randomised, double-blind and placebo control. Setting: University referral centre. Population: Infertile women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy with or without additional procedures. Methods: One hundred and forty-four women were randomised to receive 10 mL of 1% lignocaine at the surgical sites before incision and 10 mL of normal saline before closure of incision (the preemptive group), saline before incision and lignocaine before closure of incision (the preclosure group) and saline at the surgical sites both before incision and closure of incision (the placebo group). Main outcome measures: Post-operative wound pain measured by linear visual analogue scale and amount of analgesic use. Results: The women in the preclosure group had significantly lower pain scores at 2, 4 and 24 hours than those in the placebo group, whereas the women in the preemptive group only showed significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours than the placebo group. The pain score at 24 hours in the preclosure group was significantly lower than that in the preemptive group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative analgesic requirement among the three groups. Conclusion: The preclosure analgesia is better than preemptive analgesia and no analgesia in reducing postoperative wound pain.</description.abstract>
<language>eng</language>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal&apos;s web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG</publisher>
<relation.ispartof>BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</relation.ispartof>
<subject.mesh>Adult</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Anesthetics, Local - Administration &amp; Dosage</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Double-Blind Method</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Female</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Humans</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Infertility, Female - Surgery</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Laparoscopy - Adverse Effects</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Lidocaine - Administration &amp; Dosage</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Pain, Postoperative - Drug Therapy</subject.mesh>
<subject.mesh>Wound Healing - Physiology</subject.mesh>
<title>Efficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control study</title>
<type>Article</type>
<description.nature>link_to_subscribed_fulltext</description.nature>
<identifier.doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.x</identifier.doi>
<identifier.pmid>15008770</identifier.pmid>
<identifier.scopus>eid_2-s2.0-1842579455</identifier.scopus>
<relation.references>http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842579455&amp;selection=ref&amp;src=s&amp;origin=recordpage</relation.references>
<identifier.volume>111</identifier.volume>
<identifier.issue>4</identifier.issue>
<identifier.spage>340</identifier.spage>
<identifier.epage>344</identifier.epage>
<identifier.isi>WOS:000220476700010</identifier.isi>
<publisher.place>United Kingdom</publisher.place>
</item>
Author Affiliations
  1. The University of Hong Kong