File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control study

TitleEfficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control study
Authors
Issue Date2004
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG
Citation
Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2004, v. 111 n. 4, p. 340-344 How to Cite?
Abstract
Objective: To compare preemptive analgesia and preclosure analgesia in reducing wound pain after laparoscopic operation. Design: Randomised, double-blind and placebo control. Setting: University referral centre. Population: Infertile women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy with or without additional procedures. Methods: One hundred and forty-four women were randomised to receive 10 mL of 1% lignocaine at the surgical sites before incision and 10 mL of normal saline before closure of incision (the preemptive group), saline before incision and lignocaine before closure of incision (the preclosure group) and saline at the surgical sites both before incision and closure of incision (the placebo group). Main outcome measures: Post-operative wound pain measured by linear visual analogue scale and amount of analgesic use. Results: The women in the preclosure group had significantly lower pain scores at 2, 4 and 24 hours than those in the placebo group, whereas the women in the preemptive group only showed significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours than the placebo group. The pain score at 24 hours in the preclosure group was significantly lower than that in the preemptive group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative analgesic requirement among the three groups. Conclusion: The preclosure analgesia is better than preemptive analgesia and no analgesia in reducing postoperative wound pain.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/173283
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 3.862
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

Author Affiliations
  1. The University of Hong Kong
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, KWen_US
dc.contributor.authorPun, TCen_US
dc.contributor.authorNg, EHYen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, KSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:29:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:29:04Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.citationBjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2004, v. 111 n. 4, p. 340-344en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/173283-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare preemptive analgesia and preclosure analgesia in reducing wound pain after laparoscopic operation. Design: Randomised, double-blind and placebo control. Setting: University referral centre. Population: Infertile women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy with or without additional procedures. Methods: One hundred and forty-four women were randomised to receive 10 mL of 1% lignocaine at the surgical sites before incision and 10 mL of normal saline before closure of incision (the preemptive group), saline before incision and lignocaine before closure of incision (the preclosure group) and saline at the surgical sites both before incision and closure of incision (the placebo group). Main outcome measures: Post-operative wound pain measured by linear visual analogue scale and amount of analgesic use. Results: The women in the preclosure group had significantly lower pain scores at 2, 4 and 24 hours than those in the placebo group, whereas the women in the preemptive group only showed significantly lower pain scores at 2 hours than the placebo group. The pain score at 24 hours in the preclosure group was significantly lower than that in the preemptive group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative analgesic requirement among the three groups. Conclusion: The preclosure analgesia is better than preemptive analgesia and no analgesia in reducing postoperative wound pain.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAnesthetics, Local - Administration & Dosageen_US
dc.subject.meshDouble-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshInfertility, Female - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopy - Adverse Effectsen_US
dc.subject.meshLidocaine - Administration & Dosageen_US
dc.subject.meshPain, Postoperative - Drug Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshWound Healing - Physiologyen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of preemptive analgesia for wound pain after laparoscopic operations in infertile women: A randomised, double-blind and placebo control studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailNg, EHY:nghye@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityNg, EHY=rp00426en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00083.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15008770en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-1842579455en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842579455&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume111en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage340en_US
dc.identifier.epage344en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000220476700010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, KW=13407245500en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPun, TC=7005509306en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, EHY=35238184300en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, KS=37096554100en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats