File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Selection, optimization, and compensation questionnaire: A validation study with Chinese older adults

TitleSelection, optimization, and compensation questionnaire: A validation study with Chinese older adults
Authors
KeywordsChinese
Soc
Validation
Issue Date2002
PublisherHaworth Press, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.haworthpress.com/web/CG
Citation
Clinical Gerontologist, 2002, v. 24 n. 1-2, p. 141-151 How to Cite?
AbstractThe reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Life Management Strategies: Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire (SOC questionnaire) were investigated in a Hong Kong Chinese older adults sample. The internal consistency, construct validity, convergent validity and discriminant validity of the Chinese version of SOC questionnaire were also established. The SOC questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency including the three subscales: Elective Selection subscale, Optimization subscale, and Compensation subscale. In terms of construct validity, the Chinese version of SOC questionnaire correlated negatively with depressive symptoms assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression (CES-D) scale. Moreover, the construct validity of the SOC questionnaire was demonstrated by the positive association between the SOC questionnaire and self esteem and life satisfaction. Finally, the convergent and discriminant validity of the SOC questionnaire were also established by the significant association between all three subscales of the SOC questionnaire and Openness Factor of Neo-Five Factor Inventory and non-significant relationship between all three subscales of the SOC questionnaire and Agreeableness Factor of Neo-Five Factor Inventory. © 2001 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/172063
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.589
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.385
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChou, KLen_US
dc.contributor.authorChi, Ien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:19:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:19:53Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Gerontologist, 2002, v. 24 n. 1-2, p. 141-151en_US
dc.identifier.issn0731-7115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/172063-
dc.description.abstractThe reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Life Management Strategies: Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire (SOC questionnaire) were investigated in a Hong Kong Chinese older adults sample. The internal consistency, construct validity, convergent validity and discriminant validity of the Chinese version of SOC questionnaire were also established. The SOC questionnaire demonstrated acceptable internal consistency including the three subscales: Elective Selection subscale, Optimization subscale, and Compensation subscale. In terms of construct validity, the Chinese version of SOC questionnaire correlated negatively with depressive symptoms assessed by the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression (CES-D) scale. Moreover, the construct validity of the SOC questionnaire was demonstrated by the positive association between the SOC questionnaire and self esteem and life satisfaction. Finally, the convergent and discriminant validity of the SOC questionnaire were also established by the significant association between all three subscales of the SOC questionnaire and Openness Factor of Neo-Five Factor Inventory and non-significant relationship between all three subscales of the SOC questionnaire and Agreeableness Factor of Neo-Five Factor Inventory. © 2001 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherHaworth Press, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.haworthpress.com/web/CGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Gerontologisten_US
dc.subjectChineseen_US
dc.subjectSocen_US
dc.subjectValidationen_US
dc.titleSelection, optimization, and compensation questionnaire: A validation study with Chinese older adultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailChou, KL: klchou@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityChou, KL=rp00583en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1300/J018v24n01_10en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036293547en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036293547&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue1-2en_US
dc.identifier.spage141en_US
dc.identifier.epage151en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChou, KL=7201905320en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChi, I=7005697907en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats