File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Institutional design of public agencies and coproduction: A study of irrigation associations in Taiwan

TitleInstitutional design of public agencies and coproduction: A study of irrigation associations in Taiwan
Authors
Issue Date1996
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev
Citation
World Development, 1996, v. 24 n. 6, p. 1039-1054 How to Cite?
AbstractThe provision and production of many public goods and services involve the joint effort of government officials and citizen-users. This paper examines the successful experience of irrigation governance and management in Taiwan as a means of understanding how joint efforts can be established and sustained through institutional arrangements. Several principles for institutional design, including a careful definition of the scope of farmers' participation, complementarity of interests between individuals, reduction of asymmetries involved in the use of authority, and the existence of domains of autonomy are identified as instrumental to the success in Taiwan. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/171806
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.438
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.100
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, WFen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:17:40Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:17:40Z-
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.citationWorld Development, 1996, v. 24 n. 6, p. 1039-1054en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-750Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/171806-
dc.description.abstractThe provision and production of many public goods and services involve the joint effort of government officials and citizen-users. This paper examines the successful experience of irrigation governance and management in Taiwan as a means of understanding how joint efforts can be established and sustained through institutional arrangements. Several principles for institutional design, including a careful definition of the scope of farmers' participation, complementarity of interests between individuals, reduction of asymmetries involved in the use of authority, and the existence of domains of autonomy are identified as instrumental to the success in Taiwan. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddeven_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Developmenten_US
dc.titleInstitutional design of public agencies and coproduction: A study of irrigation associations in Taiwanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0305-750X(96)00020-4en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0030459891en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030459891&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage1039en_US
dc.identifier.epage1054en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1996UW25900007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats