File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cognitive and Motivational Processes Underlying Coping Flexibility: A Dual-Process Model

TitleCognitive and Motivational Processes Underlying Coping Flexibility: A Dual-Process Model
Authors
Issue Date2003
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/journals/psp.html
Citation
Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 2003, v. 84 n. 2, p. 425-438 How to Cite?
AbstractDiscriminative facility was proposed as a cognitive process and need for closure was proposed as a motivational process underlying coping flexibility. The dual-process model posits that need for closure influences discriminative facility, which in turn modifies coping flexibility and psychological adjustment. In Study 1, results of structural equation modeling provided support for the dual-process model. This model was further examined using experimental methods (Study 2) and a prospective design (Study 3). Consistent with the dual-process model, results from all 3 studies showed that participants who were more motivated to seek alternative coping strategies tended to encode stressful situations in a more differentiated way. These individuals used a greater variety of strategies to fit different situational demands and were better adjusted.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/168965
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.736
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.040
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-08T03:40:15Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-08T03:40:15Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 2003, v. 84 n. 2, p. 425-438en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3514en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/168965-
dc.description.abstractDiscriminative facility was proposed as a cognitive process and need for closure was proposed as a motivational process underlying coping flexibility. The dual-process model posits that need for closure influences discriminative facility, which in turn modifies coping flexibility and psychological adjustment. In Study 1, results of structural equation modeling provided support for the dual-process model. This model was further examined using experimental methods (Study 2) and a prospective design (Study 3). Consistent with the dual-process model, results from all 3 studies showed that participants who were more motivated to seek alternative coping strategies tended to encode stressful situations in a more differentiated way. These individuals used a greater variety of strategies to fit different situational demands and were better adjusted.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/journals/psp.htmlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Personality and Social Psychologyen_US
dc.titleCognitive and Motivational Processes Underlying Coping Flexibility: A Dual-Process Modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailCheng, C:ceci-cheng@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityCheng, C=rp00588en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037//0022-3514.84.2.425en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12585814-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0038322123en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038322123&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume84en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage425en_US
dc.identifier.epage438en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000180538100012-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheng, C=7404798168en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats