File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-69249124023
- WOS: WOS:000271360200003
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 2
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing
Title | Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | CALFED Institutions Networks Policy analysis Water |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/envsci |
Citation | Environmental Science And Policy, 2009, v. 12 n. 6, p. 653-662 How to Cite? |
Abstract | To move beyond legal and regulatory gridlock around water issues in the California Bay-Delta, a new inter-agency initiative, commonly known as CALFED, was created in 1994. CALFED has been an ongoing experiment in policy innovation. Part of the change in management practice has involved constructing new arenas that engage multiple perspectives and transform regulatory impasse into provisional steps forward. We examine the construction of so-called boundary objects, which are forums and policy instruments that cross group boundaries and foster integrative deliberation. We compare the design and action of two boundary objects created by CALFED, namely the Environmental Water Account (EWA) and the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program. We find that the presence of the boundary object, in itself, does little to explain the success of each policy experiment. Rather, the answer lies in the types of network interactions that result, along with the way meaning is coproduced. In fact, rather than create new patterns of interrelationship (e.g., between fish habitat advocates and pump station operators), the boundary object might further embed institutionalized routines. To more deeply understand what makes the new institution an integrative one, we introduce the concept of Ways of Knowing which explains how new knowledge emerges from the network of new relationships. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167162 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 6.424 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.716 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lejano, RP | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ingram, H | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-28T04:04:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-28T04:04:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Environmental Science And Policy, 2009, v. 12 n. 6, p. 653-662 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1462-9011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167162 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To move beyond legal and regulatory gridlock around water issues in the California Bay-Delta, a new inter-agency initiative, commonly known as CALFED, was created in 1994. CALFED has been an ongoing experiment in policy innovation. Part of the change in management practice has involved constructing new arenas that engage multiple perspectives and transform regulatory impasse into provisional steps forward. We examine the construction of so-called boundary objects, which are forums and policy instruments that cross group boundaries and foster integrative deliberation. We compare the design and action of two boundary objects created by CALFED, namely the Environmental Water Account (EWA) and the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program. We find that the presence of the boundary object, in itself, does little to explain the success of each policy experiment. Rather, the answer lies in the types of network interactions that result, along with the way meaning is coproduced. In fact, rather than create new patterns of interrelationship (e.g., between fish habitat advocates and pump station operators), the boundary object might further embed institutionalized routines. To more deeply understand what makes the new institution an integrative one, we introduce the concept of Ways of Knowing which explains how new knowledge emerges from the network of new relationships. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/envsci | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental Science and Policy | en_HK |
dc.subject | CALFED | en_HK |
dc.subject | Institutions | en_HK |
dc.subject | Networks | en_HK |
dc.subject | Policy analysis | en_HK |
dc.subject | Water | en_HK |
dc.title | Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lejano, RP: lejano@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lejano, RP=rp01666 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-69249124023 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-69249124023&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 12 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 653 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 662 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000271360200003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lejano, RP=6602298801 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ingram, H=7004283258 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 6081088 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1462-9011 | - |