File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity

TitleA comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity
Authors
Keywordsbiases
common method variance
creative industries
creativity
innovation
job design
leadership
meta-analysis
self-ratings
work environment
Issue Date2012
PublisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=105580
Citation
Human Relations, 2012, v. 65 n. 8, p. 1021-1047 How to Cite?
AbstractBoth self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity (supervisor ratings, peer ratings, and objective measures of creativity) have been used frequently in the literature, but there have been no attempts to compare research results using different types of creativity measures. In the present meta-analysis, we examined the relationships of a wide array of personal characteristics and contextual factors with both types of creativity measures. The results suggest that, in a majority of cases, effect sizes are larger when self-ratings of employee creativity are used. The article concludes with a discussion of the circumstances when inflation of observed correlations is most likely to occur, some steps for reducing inflated observed correlations, and other issues germane to empirical creativity research. © The Author(s) 2012.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/164765
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.619
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.117
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, TWHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, DCen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T08:09:07Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T08:09:07Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_HK
dc.identifier.citationHuman Relations, 2012, v. 65 n. 8, p. 1021-1047en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0018-7267en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/164765-
dc.description.abstractBoth self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity (supervisor ratings, peer ratings, and objective measures of creativity) have been used frequently in the literature, but there have been no attempts to compare research results using different types of creativity measures. In the present meta-analysis, we examined the relationships of a wide array of personal characteristics and contextual factors with both types of creativity measures. The results suggest that, in a majority of cases, effect sizes are larger when self-ratings of employee creativity are used. The article concludes with a discussion of the circumstances when inflation of observed correlations is most likely to occur, some steps for reducing inflated observed correlations, and other issues germane to empirical creativity research. © The Author(s) 2012.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=105580en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Relationsen_HK
dc.subjectbiasesen_HK
dc.subjectcommon method varianceen_HK
dc.subjectcreative industriesen_HK
dc.subjectcreativityen_HK
dc.subjectinnovationen_HK
dc.subjectjob designen_HK
dc.subjectleadershipen_HK
dc.subjectmeta-analysisen_HK
dc.subjectself-ratingsen_HK
dc.subjectwork environmenten_HK
dc.titleA comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativityen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailNg, TWH: twhng@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityNg, TWH=rp01088en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0018726712446015en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84864294277en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros210620en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84864294277&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume65en_HK
dc.identifier.issue8en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1021en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1047en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000306666200005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, TWH=8564407300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFeldman, DC=7402702773en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats